Robinson L E, Miranda M E, Miranda N L, Childs J E
Viral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1996 Jun;27(2):250-6.
A mass canine rabies vaccination campaign in Sorsogon Province, the Republic of the Philippines, was conducted in April and May 1993. From 1 to 14 days following visits by vaccination teams to 30 selected villages (barangays), survey teams revisited the barangays to assess vaccine coverage. Modified cluster survey methods were used to gather information about vaccine coverage in the owned-dog population (210 households) and about characteristics of owned-dogs and factors influencing owner willingness to participate in the campaign. Vaccinated dogs were identified by asking owners about receipt of certificates given by the vaccinating teams and examining each animal for a special collar or paint mark placed on the animal at the time of vaccination. Survey results indicated that 73% (178/243) of eligible dogs were vaccinated and 82% of vaccinated dogs were marked with a collar or paint. Dogs were owned by 69% of households and ranged in age from 3 days to 13 years (median = 1 year), and the ratio of male to females dogs was 1:1. The dog-to-human ratio was 1:3.8, with an average of 1.4 dogs per household or 2.1 dogs per dog-owning household. Most dogs were kept as guards (83%) and most were free-ranging (85%). The most common reasons dogs were not vaccinated included they could not be restrained (11/64), the owner was not home (10/64), and fear of injury resulting from vaccination (10/64). The owners of 20% of vaccinated dogs reported some adverse reaction in their pet. Improved vaccine coverage was significantly associated with restrained dogs kept primarily for guard functions by owners who received information about the vaccination campaign from multiple sources. Vaccine coverage was sufficiently high to potentially control rabies transmission among dogs through herd immunity and indicated a successful vaccine campaign.
1993年4月和5月，在菲律宾共和国索索贡省开展了一场大规模犬类狂犬病疫苗接种运动。在疫苗接种团队走访30个选定村庄（ barangays ）后的1至14天内，调查团队再次访问这些村庄，以评估疫苗接种覆盖率。采用改良的整群抽样调查方法，收集有关家养犬群（210户家庭）疫苗接种覆盖率的信息，以及家养犬的特征和影响主人参与该运动意愿的因素。通过询问主人是否收到疫苗接种团队发放的证书，并检查每只动物是否佩戴了接种时放置的特殊项圈或涂有标记，来确定已接种疫苗的犬只。调查结果显示，73%（178/243）的符合条件的犬只接种了疫苗，82%的接种犬只佩戴了项圈或有涂记。69%的家庭养狗，犬只年龄从3天到13岁不等（中位数 = 1岁），公犬与母犬的比例为1:1。犬与人的比例为1:3.8，每户平均有1.4只犬，养狗家庭平均每户有2.1只犬。大多数犬用于看家护院（83%），且大多散养（85%）。犬只未接种疫苗的最常见原因包括无法控制（11/64）、主人不在家（10/64）以及担心接种疫苗会造成伤害（10/64）。20%的接种犬只的主人报告其宠物出现了一些不良反应。疫苗接种覆盖率的提高与主人从多个渠道获得疫苗接种运动信息、主要用于看家护院且能被控制的犬只显著相关。疫苗接种覆盖率足够高，有可能通过群体免疫控制犬类狂犬病传播，表明疫苗接种运动取得了成功。
