Suppr超能文献

Serologic test for syphilis as a surrogate marker for human immunodeficiency virus infection among United States blood donors.

作者信息

Herrera G A, Lackritz E M, Janssen R S, Raimondi V P, Dodd R Y, Aberle-Grasse J, Petersen L R

机构信息

Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1997 Aug;37(8):836-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37897424407.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the usefulness of the serologic test for syphilis (STS) in preventing the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C viruses, and human T-lymphotropic virus via the transfusion of seronegative, infectious window-period blood.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Demographic and laboratory information on blood donations made between January 1992 and June 1994 in 18 American Red Cross regions was analyzed. It was assumed that the same proportion of HIV-positive and HIV-infectious window-period donations reacted on STS and were negative on other screening tests (hepatitis B and C viruses and human T-lymphotropic virus). This proportion multiplied by the estimated number of HIV-infectious window-period donations is the number of post-screening HIV-infectious donations removed by STS.

RESULTS

Of 4,468,570 donations, 12,145 (0.27%) were STS positive and 377 (0.008%) were HIV positive. Among donations that were negative on other screening tests, STS-reactive donations were 12 times more likely to be HIV positive (odds ratio = 11.9; 95% CI = 5,26). However, of an estimated 13 infectious window-period donations, 0.2 would have been removed because of a reactive STS, at a cost of over $16 million.

CONCLUSION

STS is a poor marker and a costly strategy for preventing post-screening HIV infections and other blood-borne diseases.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验