• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰严重胃食管反流病手术治疗与药物治疗的终身成本

Lifetime costs of surgical versus medical treatment of severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Finland.

作者信息

Viljakka M, Nevalainen J, Isolauri J

机构信息

Medical School, Dept. of Surgery, University of Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997 Aug;32(8):766-72. doi: 10.3109/00365529708996532.

DOI:10.3109/00365529708996532
PMID:9282967
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be effectively treated pharmacologically or surgically. As GERD is often a chronic condition, we compared the long-term costs of medical and surgical management.

METHODS

The medical regimens were ranitidine (150 or 300 mg/day), omeprazole (20 or 40 mg/day), and lansoprazole (30 mg/day), with costs calculated for total life expectancy after diagnosis and for one-third of that time. Costs for open or laparoscopic surgery (Nissen fundoplication) included pre- and post-operative investigations, sick leave, and calculated financial loss due to fatal outcome.

RESULTS

Costs were lowest with ranitidine, 150 mg/day, for one-third of the patient's lifetime and highest with lifelong omeprazole, 40 mg/daily. The cost of open or laparoscopic operation was less than that of lifelong daily treatment with proton pump inhibitors or ranitidine, 300 mg daily.

CONCLUSION

In Finland, antireflux surgery for GERD is cheaper than lifetime treatment with proton pump inhibitors.

摘要

背景

胃食管反流病(GERD)可通过药物或手术有效治疗。由于GERD通常是一种慢性病,我们比较了药物治疗和手术治疗的长期成本。

方法

药物治疗方案为雷尼替丁(150或300毫克/天)、奥美拉唑(20或40毫克/天)和兰索拉唑(30毫克/天),计算诊断后的预期寿命总成本以及该时间的三分之一的成本。开放手术或腹腔镜手术(nissen胃底折叠术)的成本包括术前和术后检查、病假以及因致命结果计算的经济损失。

结果

雷尼替丁150毫克/天治疗患者一生的三分之一时间成本最低,而奥美拉唑40毫克/天终身治疗成本最高。开放手术或腹腔镜手术的成本低于质子泵抑制剂或雷尼替丁300毫克/天终身每日治疗的成本。

结论

在芬兰,GERD的抗反流手术比质子泵抑制剂终身治疗便宜。

相似文献

1
Lifetime costs of surgical versus medical treatment of severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Finland.芬兰严重胃食管反流病手术治疗与药物治疗的终身成本
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997 Aug;32(8):766-72. doi: 10.3109/00365529708996532.
2
Laparoscopic fundoplication versus lansoprazole for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A pH-metric comparison.腹腔镜胃底折叠术与兰索拉唑治疗胃食管反流病的pH值测定比较
Dig Liver Dis. 2002 Feb;34(2):99-104. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(02)80237-7.
3
Impact of proton pump inhibitor utilization patterns on gastroesophageal reflux disease-related costs.质子泵抑制剂使用模式对胃食管反流病相关费用的影响。
Manag Care. 2002 Jul;11(7 Suppl):14-8.
4
The cost of long term therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised trial comparing omeprazole and open antireflux surgery.胃食管反流病长期治疗的费用:一项比较奥美拉唑与开放式抗反流手术的随机试验
Gut. 2001 Oct;49(4):488-94. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.4.488.
5
Proton pump inhibitors or surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.质子泵抑制剂或用于治疗胃食管反流病的手术。
Dig Liver Dis. 2002 Feb;34(2):95-6. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(02)80235-3.
6
Prospective trial of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitor therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Seven-year follow-up.腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术与质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病的前瞻性试验:七年随访
J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Nov;10(9):1312-6; discussion 1316-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.010.
7
Cost-minimization analysis of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Implications of varying holding time on conclusions.胃食管反流病治疗的成本最小化分析。不同持续时间对结论的影响。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004 Feb;21(2-3):171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2003.10.004.
8
Effectiveness and costs of omeprazole vs ranitidine for treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care clinics in West Virginia.奥美拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗西弗吉尼亚州初级保健诊所症状性胃食管反流病的疗效与成本
Arch Fam Med. 2000 Jul;9(7):624-30. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.7.624.
9
Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: cost effectiveness study.腹腔镜胃底折叠术与药物治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益研究
BMJ. 2009 Jul 14;339:b2576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2576.
10
Re-examination of the cost-effectiveness of surgical versus medical therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the value of long-term data collection.重新审视胃食管反流病患者手术治疗与药物治疗的成本效益:长期数据收集的价值。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1023-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30891.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review of the literature.质子泵抑制剂与腹腔镜 Nissen 胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益比较:文献系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3127-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1689-y. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
2
A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD.药物治疗或手术(腹腔镜胃底折叠术)治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003.
3
How should Barrett's ulceration be treated?
巴雷特溃疡应如何治疗?
Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):338-44. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8276-9. Epub 2004 Jan 12.
4
Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett's esophagus.一项比较巴雷特食管内科治疗与外科治疗的随机前瞻性研究的长期结果
Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):291-8. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000055269.77838.8E.
5
Laparoscopic fundoplication is the treatment of choice for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Antagonist.腹腔镜胃底折叠术是胃食管反流病的首选治疗方法。拮抗剂。
Gut. 2002 Oct;51(4):472-4. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.4.472.
6
Absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a majority of patients taking acid suppression medications after Nissen fundoplication.大多数接受nissen胃底折叠术并服用抑酸药物的患者未患胃食管反流病。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;6(1):3-9; discussion 10. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00031-2.