• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胃底折叠术与药物治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益研究

Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: cost effectiveness study.

作者信息

Epstein David, Bojke Laura, Sculpher Mark J

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York YO1 5DD.

出版信息

BMJ. 2009 Jul 14;339:b2576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2576.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.b2576
PMID:19654097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2714673/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the long term costs, health benefits, and cost effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery compared with those of continued medical management for patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).

DESIGN

We estimated resource use and costs for the first year on the basis of data from the REFLUX trial. A Markov model was used to extrapolate cost and health benefit over a lifetime using data collected in the REFLUX trial and other sources.

PARTICIPANTS

The model compared laparoscopic surgery and continued proton pump inhibitors in male patients aged 45 and stable on GORD medication.

INTERVENTION

Laparoscopic surgery versus continued medical management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We estimated quality adjusted life years and GORD related costs to the health service over a lifetime. Sensitivity analyses considered other plausible scenarios, in particular size and duration of treatment effect and the GORD symptoms of patients in whom surgery is unsuccessful. Main results The base case model indicated that surgery is likely to be considered cost effective on average with an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of pound2648 (euro3110; US$4385) per quality adjusted life year and that the probability that surgery is cost effective is 0.94 at a threshold incremental cost effectiveness ratio of pound20 000. The results were sensitive to some assumptions within the extrapolation modelling.

CONCLUSION

Surgery seems to be more cost effective on average than medical management in many of the scenarios examined in this study. Surgery might not be cost effective if the treatment effect does not persist over the long term, if patients who return to medical management have poor health related quality of life, or if proton pump inhibitors were cheaper. Further follow-up of patients from the REFLUX trial may be valuable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN15517081.

摘要

目的

描述与胃食管反流病(GORD)患者持续药物治疗相比,腹腔镜手术的长期成本、健康效益及成本效益。

设计

我们根据反流试验的数据估算了第一年的资源使用和成本。使用马尔可夫模型,利用反流试验及其他来源收集的数据推断一生的成本和健康效益。

参与者

该模型比较了45岁且GORD药物治疗稳定的男性患者接受腹腔镜手术和持续使用质子泵抑制剂的情况。

干预措施

腹腔镜手术与持续药物治疗。

主要结局指标

我们估算了一生的质量调整生命年以及与GORD相关的卫生服务成本。敏感性分析考虑了其他合理情景,特别是治疗效果的大小和持续时间以及手术不成功患者的GORD症状。主要结果基础病例模型表明,平均而言手术可能被认为具有成本效益,每质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比为2648英镑(3110欧元;4385美元),在增量成本效益比阈值为20000英镑时,手术具有成本效益的概率为0.94。结果对外推模型中的一些假设敏感。

结论

在本研究考察的许多情景中,手术似乎平均比药物治疗更具成本效益。如果治疗效果不能长期持续、转回药物治疗的患者健康相关生活质量较差或质子泵抑制剂更便宜,手术可能不具有成本效益。对反流试验患者的进一步随访可能很有价值。

试验注册号

ISRCTN15517081。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be1/4787584/8fecf40fcc67/epsd614420.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be1/4787584/8fecf40fcc67/epsd614420.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be1/4787584/8fecf40fcc67/epsd614420.f1_default.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: cost effectiveness study.腹腔镜胃底折叠术与药物治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益研究
BMJ. 2009 Jul 14;339:b2576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2576.
2
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimal access surgery amongst people with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - a UK collaborative study. The REFLUX trial.胃食管反流病患者中微创手术的有效性和成本效益——一项英国合作研究。反流试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Sep;12(31):1-181, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta12310.
3
Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: 5-year follow-up of multicentre randomised trial (the REFLUX trial).腹腔镜手术与药物治疗胃食管反流病的临床和经济评价:多中心随机试验(REFLUX 试验)的 5 年随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(22):1-167. doi: 10.3310/hta17220.
4
A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD.药物治疗或手术(腹腔镜胃底折叠术)治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003.
5
Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication versus continued medical management for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on long-term follow-up of the REFLUX trial.基于 REFLUX 试验的长期随访结果,腹腔镜胃底折叠术与继续药物治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益比较。
Br J Surg. 2013 Aug;100(9):1205-13. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9190. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
6
Laparoscopic fundoplication surgery versus medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults.成人胃食管反流病(GORD)的腹腔镜胃底折叠术与药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 5;2015(11):CD003243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003243.pub3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of the RefluxStop device for management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in Switzerland.RefluxStop 装置治疗瑞士难治性胃食管反流病的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):805-815. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2362564. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
8
Cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review of the literature.质子泵抑制剂与腹腔镜 Nissen 胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益比较:文献系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3127-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1689-y. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
9
Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomised trial.与药物治疗相比,微创手术治疗慢性胃食管反流病:英国协作随机试验。
BMJ. 2008 Dec 15;337:a2664. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2664.
10
Long-term cost-effectiveness of medical, endoscopic and surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病的药物、内镜及手术治疗的长期成本效益
Surgery. 2015 Jan;157(1):126-36. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of proton pump inhibitors in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.胃食管反流病患者使用质子泵抑制剂的经济学评价:一项系统综述
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 20;11(1):e001465. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001465.
2
Antireflux mucosal valvuloplasty versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in a tertiary healthcare centre in China: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.中国一家三级医疗中心抗反流黏膜瓣膜成形术与质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病患者的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e088970. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088970.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Commentary: Randomised trials of surgical and non-surgical treatment: a role model for the future.
BMJ. 2008 Dec 15;337:a2747. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2747.
2
Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomised trial.与药物治疗相比,微创手术治疗慢性胃食管反流病:英国协作随机试验。
BMJ. 2008 Dec 15;337:a2664. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2664.
3
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimal access surgery amongst people with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - a UK collaborative study. The REFLUX trial.胃食管反流病患者中微创手术的有效性和成本效益——一项英国合作研究。反流试验。
Giant diaphragmatic hernia surgical treatment by laparoscopic repair: a case report.
腹腔镜修补术治疗巨大膈疝:病例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Jun 3;2024(6):rjae387. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae387. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Current Status of Anti-Reflux Surgery as a Treatment for GERD.胃食管反流病的抗反流手术治疗现状。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 21;60(3):518. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030518.
5
UK cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus lifestyle modification alone for adults with class II obesity.英国针对 II 类肥胖成年人的内镜袖状胃切除术与单纯生活方式改变的成本效益分析。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2023 Nov;47(11):1161-1170. doi: 10.1038/s41366-023-01374-6. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
6
Environmental effects of surgical procedures and strategies for sustainable surgery.手术操作的环境影响与可持续手术策略。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;20(6):399-410. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00716-5. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
7
Transoral incisionless fundoplication is cost-effective for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.经口无切口胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病具有成本效益。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jul 15;10(7):E923-E932. doi: 10.1055/a-1783-9378. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
2020 Seoul Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.《2020年胃食管反流病诊断与管理首尔共识》
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Oct 30;27(4):453-481. doi: 10.5056/jnm21077.
9
Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.胃食管反流病的手术治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4095-4123. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08358-5. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
10
The characteristics of antireflux surgery compared to proton pump inhibitor treatment in Korea: a nationwide study using claim data from 2007 to 2016.韩国抗反流手术与质子泵抑制剂治疗的比较特征:一项利用2007年至2016年理赔数据的全国性研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020 May;98(5):254-261. doi: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.5.254. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Sep;12(31):1-181, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta12310.
4
Comparing laparoscopic antireflux surgery with esomeprazole in the management of patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year interim analysis of the LOTUS trial.比较腹腔镜抗反流手术与埃索美拉唑治疗慢性胃食管反流病患者的疗效:LOTUS试验的3年中期分析
Gut. 2008 Sep;57(9):1207-13. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.148833. Epub 2008 May 9.
5
A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD.药物治疗或手术(腹腔镜胃底折叠术)治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003.
6
Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease.使用质子泵抑制剂、H2受体拮抗剂和促动力药对胃食管反流病样症状及内镜检查阴性的反流病进行短期治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD002095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002095.pub3.
7
Short-term cost effectiveness and long-term cost analysis comparing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with proton-pump inhibitor maintenance for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.比较腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术与质子泵抑制剂维持治疗胃食管反流病的短期成本效益和长期成本分析
Br J Surg. 2005 Jun;92(6):700-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4933.
8
Re-examination of the cost-effectiveness of surgical versus medical therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the value of long-term data collection.重新审视胃食管反流病患者手术治疗与药物治疗的成本效益:长期数据收集的价值。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1023-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30891.x.
9
Medical or surgical therapy for erosive reflux esophagitis: cost-utility analysis using a Markov model.糜烂性反流性食管炎的药物或手术治疗:使用马尔可夫模型的成本效益分析
Ann Surg. 2002 Aug;236(2):191-202. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200208000-00007.
10
The cost of long term therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised trial comparing omeprazole and open antireflux surgery.胃食管反流病长期治疗的费用:一项比较奥美拉唑与开放式抗反流手术的随机试验
Gut. 2001 Oct;49(4):488-94. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.4.488.