Suppr超能文献

因充血性心力衰竭入院患者的治疗:实践模式和治疗结果中的专业相关差异。

Treatment of patients admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure: specialty-related disparities in practice patterns and outcomes.

作者信息

Reis S E, Holubkov R, Edmundowicz D, McNamara D M, Zell K A, Detre K M, Feldman A M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Sep;30(3):733-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00214-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to define specialty-related differences in the care and outcome of patients admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure (CHF).

BACKGROUND

Congestive heart failure is the leading diagnosis-related group (DRG) discharge diagnosis in the United States and accounts for an estimated annual hospital cost in excess of $7 billion. The clinical impact of aggressive CHF management and the importance of the subspecialist in guiding this care have not been evaluated.

METHODS

To define differences in physician practice patterns, we performed a chart review of consecutive patients admitted to a university teaching hospital with a primary DRG discharge diagnosis of CHF. We compared treatment and outcome of patients cared for by a generalist (n = 160) and those whose care was guided by a cardiologist (n = 138) during their index hospital period with CHF and over the next 6 months.

RESULTS

At our institution, > 50% of patients admitted to the hospital with CHF cared for by generalists alone had minimal (New York Heart Association functional class I or II) symptoms, compared with < 15% of those cared for by a cardiologist (p < 0.01). Although generalists' patients underwent significantly fewer in-hospital diagnostic tests and had shorter lengths of stay, they had a 1.7-fold increased risk of readmission for CHF within 6 months (p < 0.05). Six-month cardiac and all-cause mortality were not significantly different between the groups. The type of physician caring for the patient and a history of diabetes, previous CHF or myocardial infarction were independent predictors of readmission for CHF.

CONCLUSIONS

Involvement of a cardiologist in the care of patients admitted to the hospital with CHF is associated with increased use of diagnostic testing, longer hospital stays and improved clinical outcome. These results substantiate practice guidelines that suggest a role for cardiologists in the care of symptomatic patients with CHF.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在明确因充血性心力衰竭(CHF)入院患者在治疗及预后方面的专科差异。

背景

充血性心力衰竭是美国主要的诊断相关分组(DRG)出院诊断,估计每年医院费用超过70亿美元。积极的CHF管理的临床影响以及专科医生在指导此类治疗中的重要性尚未得到评估。

方法

为明确医生实践模式的差异,我们对一所大学教学医院连续收治的以CHF为主要DRG出院诊断的患者进行了病历审查。我们比较了在索引住院期间及接下来6个月中,由普通医生治疗的患者(n = 160)和由心脏病专家指导治疗的患者(n = 138)的治疗情况及预后。

结果

在我们的机构中,仅由普通医生治疗的CHF入院患者中,超过50%症状轻微(纽约心脏协会心功能分级I或II级),而由心脏病专家治疗的患者中这一比例不到15%(p < 0.01)。尽管普通医生治疗的患者住院期间接受的诊断检查显著较少,住院时间较短,但他们在6个月内因CHF再次入院的风险增加了1.7倍(p < 0.05)。两组间6个月的心脏死亡率和全因死亡率无显著差异。治疗患者的医生类型以及糖尿病史、既往CHF或心肌梗死史是CHF再次入院的独立预测因素。

结论

心脏病专家参与CHF入院患者的治疗与诊断检查使用增加、住院时间延长及临床预后改善相关。这些结果证实了实践指南中建议心脏病专家在有症状的CHF患者治疗中发挥作用的观点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验