Suppr超能文献

充血性心力衰竭住院患者的资源利用与生存情况:主治医生专业导致的护理差异。SUPPORT研究组。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。

Resource use and survival of patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure: differences in care by specialty of the attending physician. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

作者信息

Auerbach A D, Hamel M B, Davis R B, Connors A F, Regueiro C, Desbiens N, Goldman L, Califf R M, Dawson N V, Wenger N, Vidaillet H, Phillips R S

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2000 Feb 1;132(3):191-200. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-3-200002010-00004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that specialty care is more costly but may produce improved outcomes for patients with acute cardiac illnesses.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients with congestive heart failure who are cared for by cardiologists experienced differences in costs, care patterns, and survival compared with patients of generalists.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

5 U.S. teaching hospitals between 1989 and 1994.

PATIENTS

1298 patients hospitalized with an exacerbation of congestive heart failure.

MEASUREMENTS

Hospital costs; average daily Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) score; and survival censored at 30, 180, and 365 days and 31 December 1994.

RESULTS

Compared with patients of generalists, patients of cardiologists were younger (mean age, 63.3 and 71.4 years; P < 0.001) and had lower Acute Physiology Scores at the time of admission (35.1 and 36.7; P < 0.001) but were more likely to have a history of ventricular arrhythmias (21.0% and 10.2%; P < 0.001). At 6 months, 201 (27%) patients of cardiologists and 149 (27%) patients of generalists had died. After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and severity of illness, patients of cardiologists incurred costs that were 42.9% (95% CI, 27.8% to 59.8%) higher and average daily TISS scores that were 2.83 points (CI, 1.96 to 3.68 points) higher than those of patients of generalists. Patients of cardiologists were more likely to undergo right-heart catheterization (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9 [CI, 1.7 to 4.9]) or cardiac catheterization (adjusted odds ratio, 3.9 [CI, 2.4 to 6.2]) and had higher odds for transfer to an intensive care unit and electrocardiographic monitoring. Adjusted survival did not differ significantly between groups at 30 days; however, there was a trend toward improved survival among patients of cardiologists at 1 year (adjusted relative hazard, 0.82 [CI, 0.65 to 1.04]) and at maximum follow-up (adjusted relative hazard, 0.80 [CI, 0.66 to 0.96]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study of patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure, cardiologist care was associated with greater costs and resource use and no difference in survival at 30 days of follow-up. Whether the trend toward better survival at longer follow-up represents differences in care or unadjusted illness severity is uncertain.

摘要

背景

以往研究表明,专科护理费用更高,但对于急性心脏疾病患者而言,可能会带来更好的治疗效果。

目的

确定与由普通医生治疗的充血性心力衰竭患者相比,由心脏病专家治疗的患者在费用、护理模式及生存率方面是否存在差异。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

1989年至1994年间美国的5家教学医院。

患者

1298例因充血性心力衰竭加重而住院的患者。

测量指标

医院费用;平均每日治疗干预评分系统(TISS)评分;以及在30天、180天、365天和1994年12月31日进行生存情况审查。

结果

与普通医生治疗的患者相比,心脏病专家治疗的患者更年轻(平均年龄分别为63.3岁和71.4岁;P<0.001),入院时急性生理学评分更低(分别为35.1和36.7;P<0.001),但更有可能有室性心律失常病史(分别为21.0%和10.2%;P<0.001)。6个月时,201例(27%)由心脏病专家治疗的患者和149例(27%)由普通医生治疗的患者死亡。在对社会人口学特征和疾病严重程度进行调整后,心脏病专家治疗的患者所产生的费用比普通医生治疗的患者高42.9%(95%CI,27.8%至59.8%),平均每日TISS评分比普通医生治疗的患者高2.83分(CI,1.96至3.68分)。心脏病专家治疗的患者更有可能接受右心导管检查(调整后的优势比为2.9[CI,1.7至4.9])或心脏导管检查(调整后的优势比为3.9[CI,2.4至6.2]),转入重症监护病房和进行心电图监测的几率也更高。两组在30天时调整后的生存率无显著差异;然而,在1年时(调整后的相对风险为0.82[CI,0.65至1.04])及最长随访期时(调整后的相对风险为0.80[CI,0.66至0.96]),心脏病专家治疗的患者有生存率提高的趋势。

结论

在这项对因充血性心力衰竭住院患者的观察性研究中,心脏病专家的护理与更高的费用和资源使用相关,且在随访30天时生存率无差异。在更长随访期生存率提高的趋势是代表护理差异还是未调整的疾病严重程度尚不确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验