• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于税收的医疗融资逻辑。

The logic of tax-based financing for health care.

作者信息

Bodenheimer T, Sullivan K

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1997;27(3):409-25. doi: 10.2190/YAGR-4KXN-J50E-B62H.

DOI:10.2190/YAGR-4KXN-J50E-B62H
PMID:9285274
Abstract

Employment-based health insurance faces serious problems. For the first time, the number of Americans covered by such health insurance is falling. Employers strongly oppose the employer mandate approach to extending health insurance. Employment-based financing is regressive and complex. Serious debate is needed on an alternative solution to financing health care for all Americans. Taxation represents a clear alternative to employment-based health care financing. The major criterion for choosing a tax is equity, with simplicity a second criterion. An earmarked, progressive individual income tax is a fair and potentially simple tax with which to finance health care. The political feasibility of such a tax is greater than that of employer mandate legislation.

摘要

基于就业的医疗保险面临严重问题。首次出现,受此类医疗保险覆盖的美国人数量正在下降。雇主强烈反对通过雇主强制参保的方式来扩大医疗保险覆盖范围。基于就业的筹资方式既具有累退性又复杂。需要就为所有美国人提供医疗保健筹资的替代解决方案展开严肃辩论。税收是基于就业的医疗保健筹资的一个明确替代方案。选择税种的主要标准是公平,其次是简单性。专项的累进个人所得税是一种公平且可能简单的为医疗保健筹资的税种。这种税在政治上的可行性大于雇主强制参保立法。

相似文献

1
The logic of tax-based financing for health care.基于税收的医疗融资逻辑。
Int J Health Serv. 1997;27(3):409-25. doi: 10.2190/YAGR-4KXN-J50E-B62H.
2
Funding health care with an employer mandate: efficiency and equity concerns.通过雇主强制保险为医疗保健提供资金:效率与公平问题。
St Louis Univ Law J. 1994 Fall;39(1):155-216.
3
Why paying for health care reform is difficult and essential--numbers and rules.为何为医疗保健改革付费困难却又至关重要——数字与规则
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):937-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0905967. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
4
Presidential politics and the resurgence of health care reform.总统政治与医疗保健改革的复兴。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 22;357(21):2101-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078202.
5
A win-win approach to financing health care reform.医疗保健改革融资的双赢方法。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 2;361(1):4-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0904855. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
6
Toward universal coverage in Massachusetts.迈向马萨诸塞州的全民医保覆盖。
Inquiry. 2006 Summer;43(2):102-21. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_43.2.102.
7
A road map for universal coverage: finding a pass through the financial mountains.全民医保路线图:寻找穿越金融高山之路。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Apr;33(2):155-97. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-052.
8
Health of the nation--coverage for all Americans.国家健康——为所有美国人提供医保覆盖。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 21;359(8):855-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0806374.
9
Retooling tax subsidies for health coverage: old ideas, new politics.调整医保税收补贴:旧理念,新政治。
Issue Brief Natl Health Policy Forum. 1998 Nov 12(728):1-12.
10
Designing health insurance market constructs for shared responsibility: insights from California.设计共担责任的医疗保险市场架构:来自加利福尼亚州的见解
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w431-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w431. Epub 2009 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The movement for universal health insurance: finding common ground.全民健康保险运动:寻求共识。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jan;93(1):112-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.1.112.