Spallone V, Menzinger G
Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Diabetes. 1997 Sep;46 Suppl 2:S67-76. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.2.s67.
The utility of standard cardiovascular tests for diagnosis of cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes has been well documented. Attention must be paid to standardizing the procedure with regard to time of day, metabolic status, distance from meal and insulin, coffee and smoking avoidance, and patient's collaboration. In the presence of cardiovascular disease or drugs affecting the cardiovascular or autonomic nervous system, some caution is needed in interpreting the results. More recent reflex tests, which evaluate mainly sympathetic or baroreflex activity, despite their ability to detect early autonomic involvement, lack sufficient standardization and still need to be proved as valid alternatives. Of the different methods of measuring heart rate variability, spectral analysis has a greater ability to differentiate vagal and sympathetic modulation of heart rate than do time-domain methods. However, since these latter methods are easier and more widely available, they can be used as a screening approach. Twenty-four-hour evaluation of heart rate variability provides data on the circadian rhythm of sympathovagal activity, which can be affected earlier than and differently from cardiovascular reflex tests. Information obtained could have prognostic implications in terms of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and offer therapeutic opportunities. However, a wide consensus on many technical aspects of both time-domain and frequency-domain methods is needed. Furthermore, large prospective studies in the diabetic population to assess the prognostic value of 24-h heart rate variability parameters on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are lacking. Recently, I123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy has documented abnormalities of sympathetic myocardial innervation also in newly diagnosed IDDM. The meaning of this finding, whether it is an expression of functional or structural defects, needs to be clarified. Preliminary data point to a possible pathogenetic meaning of the known association between autonomic neuropathy and other diabetic complications. This area of investigation could provide useful insights into the complex and multifactorial pathogenesis of diabetic complications.
标准心血管测试在诊断糖尿病心脏自主神经病变中的作用已有充分记录。必须注意在一天中的时间、代谢状态、进餐及胰岛素使用时间间隔、避免咖啡和吸烟以及患者配合等方面对测试程序进行标准化。在存在心血管疾病或使用影响心血管或自主神经系统的药物时,解读结果需要谨慎。尽管最近的反射测试主要评估交感神经或压力反射活动,且能够检测早期自主神经受累情况,但缺乏足够的标准化,仍需证明其作为有效替代方法的有效性。在测量心率变异性的不同方法中,频谱分析比时域方法更能区分心率的迷走神经和交感神经调节。然而,由于后一种方法更简便且应用更广泛,可作为筛查方法使用。心率变异性的24小时评估可提供关于交感迷走神经活动昼夜节律的数据,其受影响的时间可能早于心血管反射测试,且方式不同。所获得的信息在心血管发病率和死亡率方面可能具有预后意义,并提供治疗机会。然而,在时域和频域方法的许多技术方面仍需广泛达成共识。此外,缺乏在糖尿病患者中进行的大型前瞻性研究来评估24小时心率变异性参数对心血管发病率和死亡率的预后价值。最近,I123间碘苄胍(MIBG)闪烁显像也证实了新诊断的1型糖尿病患者存在交感神经心肌支配异常。这一发现的意义,无论是功能性还是结构性缺陷的表现,都需要阐明。初步数据表明自主神经病变与其他糖尿病并发症之间已知关联可能具有致病意义。这一研究领域可为糖尿病并发症复杂的多因素发病机制提供有用的见解。