Kane R A, Caplan A L, Urv-Wong E K, Freeman I C, Aroskar M A, Finch M
Division of Health Services Research, School of Public Health University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Sep;45(9):1086-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05971.x.
This study examined the importance that nursing home residents and nursing assistants ascribed to control and choice over everyday issues, the satisfaction of residents with their control and choice over these issues, and the nursing assistants' impressions of the extent to which control and choice exist for nursing home residents on everyday matters.
Cross-sectional in-person interviews with a stratified representative sample of nursing home residents and nursing assistants using semi-structured interview protocols with both fixed-choice and open-ended questions.
A random sample of 25 nursing homes in the Twin Cities, MN area; a random sample of five nursing homes in North Little Rock, AR; all five nursing homes in Sante Fe, NM; and five purposively selected nursing homes in each of New York City and Los Angeles, CA.
One hundred thirty-five cognitively intact residents, three from each facility, were selected and included the resident council chair, one randomly selected short-stay resident, and one randomly selected long-stay resident from each facility. Also participating were 134 nursing assistants (1 selected randomly from each shift from those employed at least two-thirds time and who had worked in the facility for at least 3 months).
The most important measurements were ordinal-level ratings of the importance of choice and control for nursing home residents over 10 selected areas of everyday life; ordinal measures of residents' satisfaction with their choice and control over these areas; and nursing assistants' ratings of the extent to which they thought it possible for residents to achieve choice and control. Open-ended comments were also elicited. Also measured were demographic data, ADL status, frequency of trips away from the nursing home, frequency of receiving visitors, and (for nursing assistants) length of employment, wages, job satisfaction, and extent to which they knew the residents under their care.
Cognitively intact nursing home residents attach importance to choice and control over matters such as bedtime, rising time, food, roommates, care routines, use of money, use of the telephone, trips out of the nursing home, and initiating contact with a physician. Nursing assistants view such control as important to residents. Residents and staff differ significantly in the importance attached to particular items, with staff placing lower importance than residents on use of the telephone and personal expenditures and higher importance on control and choice over visitors and formal nursing home activities. Residents were not very satisfied with their control and choice, and nursing assistants viewed them as unlikely to experience control and choice. Nursing home, resident, and staff characteristics were not associated with the patterns of results.
A self-defeating cycle has been identified where neither resident nor staff are optimistic about achieving more resident control and choice, which both groups perceive as desirable. To end this cycle, suggestions are offered for structuring the role of the nursing assistant, physician and nurse leadership, changes in nursing home routines and practices, and public policy changes.
本研究考察了疗养院居民和护理助理对日常事务中控制权和选择权的重视程度、居民对这些事务的控制权和选择权的满意度,以及护理助理对疗养院居民在日常事务中实际拥有的控制权和选择权程度的看法。
采用半结构化访谈方案,对疗养院居民和护理助理进行分层代表性样本的面对面横断面访谈,访谈问题包括固定选择和开放式问题。
明尼苏达州双子城地区随机抽取的25家疗养院;阿肯色州北小石城随机抽取的5家疗养院;新墨西哥州圣达菲的所有5家疗养院;纽约市和加利福尼亚州洛杉矶各有目的地选取的5家疗养院。
选取了135名认知健全的居民,每家疗养院3名,包括居民委员会主席、1名随机抽取的短期居住居民和1名随机抽取的长期居住居民。此外,还有134名护理助理参与(从至少三分之二时间受雇且在该机构工作至少3个月的人员中每班随机抽取1名)。
最重要的测量指标包括对疗养院居民在10个选定的日常生活领域中选择权和控制权重要性的有序等级评定;居民对这些领域的选择权和控制权的满意度的有序测量;以及护理助理对他们认为居民实现选择权和控制权可能性的评定。还收集了开放式意见。此外,还测量了人口统计学数据、日常生活活动能力状况、离开疗养院的出行频率、接待访客的频率,以及(针对护理助理)工作年限、工资、工作满意度,以及他们对所照顾居民的了解程度。
认知健全的疗养院居民重视在就寝时间、起床时间、食物、室友、护理常规、金钱使用、电话使用、离开疗养院出行以及与医生联系等事务上的选择权和控制权。护理助理认为这种控制权对居民很重要。居民和工作人员在对特定项目的重视程度上存在显著差异,工作人员对电话使用和个人支出的重视程度低于居民,而对访客和正式疗养院活动的控制权和选择权的重视程度高于居民。居民对自己的控制权和选择权不太满意,护理助理认为他们不太可能体验到控制权和选择权。疗养院、居民和工作人员的特征与结果模式无关。
已发现一个自我挫败的循环,居民和工作人员对实现更多居民控制权和选择权都不乐观,而双方都认为这是可取的。为结束这个循环,针对护理助理、医生和护士领导的角色构建、疗养院常规和做法的改变以及公共政策的改变提出了建议。