用于CT的口服造影剂：一项味觉测试调查。
Oral contrast agents for CT: a taste test survey.
作者信息
Quagliano P V, Austin R F
机构信息
Department of Radiology, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA.
出版信息
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Sep-Oct;21(5):720-2. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00007.
PURPOSE
Our goal was to evaluate the palatability of the currently available oral contrast agents for CT.
METHOD
We surveyed 202 adults (92 women and 110 men) with a mean age of 59 years. Each participant sampled five or eight products. The participants ingested 1 oz. of each product and recorded an overall score, taking into account the factors of palatability that were important to them. Scores were marked on a visual analog rating scale with 0 representing "dislike a lot" and 10 representing "like a lot."
RESULTS
The following mean palatability scores were obtained: Gastrografin mixed with Tropical Punch Kool-Aid 8.2; Scan C 5.7; Cheetah 4.7; Readi-Cat 4.4; E-Z-Cat 4.0; Tomo-Cat 3.6, Prep-Cat 3.5; Baro-Cat 3.2; Lipomul mixed with water 3.1.
CONCLUSION
Statistical cluster analysis suggested the following groupings of the products (i.e., products with statistically similar scores grouped together): Cluster 1-Kool-Aid with Gastrografin; Cluster 2-Scan C, Cheetah, Readi-Cat: Cluster 3-E-Z-Cat, Tomo-Cat, Prep-Cat, Baro-Cat, Lipomul.
目的
我们的目标是评估目前可用的CT口服对比剂的适口性。
方法
我们调查了202名成年人（92名女性和110名男性），平均年龄为59岁。每位参与者品尝了五种或八种产品。参与者摄入每种产品1盎司，并记录总体评分，同时考虑对他们来说重要的适口性因素。评分采用视觉模拟评分量表，0表示“非常不喜欢”，10表示“非常喜欢”。
结果
获得以下平均适口性评分：与热带水果味酷爱饮料混合的泛影葡胺8.2；Scan C 5.7；猎豹4.7；Readi-Cat 4.4；E-Z-Cat 4.0；Tomo-Cat 3.6；Prep-Cat 3.5；Baro-Cat 3.2；与水混合的Lipomul 3.1。
结论
统计聚类分析表明产品有以下分组（即评分在统计学上相似的产品归为一组）：第1组-与泛影葡胺混合的酷爱饮料；第2组-Scan C、猎豹、Readi-Cat；第3组-E-Z-Cat、Tomo-Cat、Prep-Cat、Baro-Cat、Lipomul。
Zotero 插件