Crouch E R, Williams P B, Gray M K, Crouch E R, Chames M
Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, USA.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Sep;115(9):1106-12. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160276001.
To determine whether topically applied aminocaproic acid, like systemic aminocaproic acid, effectively reduces secondary hemorrhage after hyphemas and to compare the safety and effectiveness of topical application with those of systemic use and a control group.
A prospective, randomized, double-masked, multicenter study.
Sixty-four patients with traumatic hyphema treated with topical or systemic aminocaproic acid and compared with 54 control patients with hyphema. Daily slitlamp examinations for hyphema grading and corneal clarity, initial and final visual acuity, applanation tonometry, and fundus indirect ophthalmoscopy were studied. Follow-up was 6 months to 5 1/2 years (mean, 2.96 years).
Compared with the control group, topical and systemic aminocaproic acid was statistically significant in preventing secondary hemorrhage. Only 3% (2/64) of the patients who received topical or systemic aminocaproic acid had secondary hemorrhage compared with 22% (12/54) of the control group (P = .002). Final visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 30 patients (86%) in the topical group compared with 23 patients (43%) in the control group (P < .001). Final visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 20 patients (69%) in the systemic aminocaproic acid group compared with 23 patients (43%) in the control group (P = .04). The topical aminocaproic acid group had a final visual acuity of 20/40 or better in 86% of patients, compared with 69% of patients in the systemic group.
Topical aminocaproic acid appears to be a safe, effective treatment to prevent secondary hemorrhage in traumatic hyphema. It is as effective as systemic aminocaproic acid in reducing secondary hemorrhage. No systemic side effects were observed with topical use. Topical aminocaproic acid provides an effective out-patient treatment for traumatic hyphemas.
确定局部应用氨基己酸是否像全身应用氨基己酸一样能有效减少前房积血后的继发性出血,并比较局部应用与全身应用及对照组的安全性和有效性。
一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心研究。
64例创伤性前房积血患者接受局部或全身氨基己酸治疗,并与54例前房积血对照患者进行比较。研究了每日使用裂隙灯检查前房积血分级和角膜清晰度、初始和最终视力、压平眼压测量以及眼底间接检眼镜检查。随访时间为6个月至5年半(平均2.96年)。
与对照组相比,局部和全身应用氨基己酸在预防继发性出血方面具有统计学意义。接受局部或全身氨基己酸治疗的患者中只有3%(2/64)发生继发性出血,而对照组为22%(12/54)(P = 0.002)。局部应用组30例患者(86%)的最终视力为20/40或更好,而对照组为23例患者(43%)(P < 0.001)。全身应用氨基己酸组20例患者(69%)的最终视力为20/40或更好,而对照组为23例患者(43%)(P = 0.04)。局部氨基己酸组86%的患者最终视力为20/40或更好,而全身应用组为69%。
局部应用氨基己酸似乎是预防创伤性前房积血继发性出血的一种安全、有效的治疗方法。在减少继发性出血方面,它与全身应用氨基己酸一样有效。局部应用未观察到全身副作用。局部应用氨基己酸为创伤性前房积血提供了一种有效的门诊治疗方法。