Jenkins O F, Morris R, Simpson J M
Perfusion Department, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Perfusion. 1997 Sep;12(5):279-88. doi: 10.1177/026765919701200502.
An anonymous postal survey about perfusion accidents, incidents and safety procedures was conducted retrospectively in all identifiable cardiac surgery units in Australia and New Zealand over an 18-month period from January 1994 to July 1995. Responses were received from 69% of all eligible perfusionists representing 39 to 42 operating units. The most frequent incidents reported were heater/cooler failure (43% of respondents), urgent return to bypass following circuit disposal (38%), air embolus in a circuit not reaching the patient (24%), accidental cannula displacement (28%), protamine-induced circuit clotting postbypass (20%), hospital power failure (31%) and oxygenator membrane leaks (24%). There were 11 serious injuries and 10 deaths reported, giving an overall rate of serious injury or death of one in 1300 cases. However, the perfusion-related injury rate was lower, at one injury or death per 2500 perfusions. The use of safety equipment was widespread with low-level alarms in use by all respondents, bubble detectors by 74%, arterial line filters by 82% and written or computerized checklists by 80%. While the rate of injury was lower than that reported in surveys done elsewhere, the rate of reporting of incidents was greater and this may reflect a changing attitude of perfusionists to accountability in the delivery of their services. The data suggest that the level of safety in perfusion in Australasia is high but that improved incident reporting may help to further improve practices.
1994年1月至1995年7月的18个月期间,对澳大利亚和新西兰所有可识别的心脏外科手术单位进行了一项关于灌注事故、事件和安全程序的匿名邮政调查。收到了代表39至42个手术单位的所有合格灌注师中69%的回复。报告的最常见事件是加热器/冷却器故障(43%的受访者)、回路处理后紧急返回体外循环(38%)、未到达患者的回路中的空气栓塞(24%)、意外插管移位(28%)、体外循环后鱼精蛋白引起的回路凝血(20%)、医院停电(31%)和氧合器膜泄漏(24%)。报告了11起严重伤害和10起死亡事件,严重伤害或死亡率总体为每1300例中有1例。然而,与灌注相关的伤害率较低,每2500次灌注中有1例受伤或死亡。安全设备的使用很普遍,所有受访者都使用了低水平警报,74%使用了气泡探测器,82%使用了动脉管路过滤器,80%使用了书面或计算机化检查表。虽然伤害率低于其他地方调查中报告的比率,但事件报告率更高,这可能反映了灌注师在提供服务时对问责制态度的转变。数据表明,澳大拉西亚地区灌注的安全水平很高,但改进事件报告可能有助于进一步改善操作。