• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

躯体体验的认知扭曲:一种测量方法的修订与验证

Cognitive distortions of somatic experiences: revision and validation of a measure.

作者信息

Moss-Morris R, Petrie K J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 1997 Sep;43(3):293-306. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(97)00020-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3999(97)00020-2
PMID:9304555
Abstract

The article reports on the revision of the Cognitive Errors Questionnaire (CEQ). The CEQ which was originally developed to measure cognitive distortions specific to chronic pain, has been significantly shortened and made applicable to a wider range of somatic problems. The Cognitive Errors Questionnaire-Revised (CEQ-R) contains two subscales: Somatic--distortions specific to somatic experiences; and General--distortions to everyday life events. Validation of the scale with CFS, depressed, and chronic pain groups and healthy controls confirms the CEQ-R loads onto general and somatic factors. Both subscales have high internal consistency and good test-retest reliability. The pattern of subjects' responses to the CEQ-R scores showed that the depressed group scored significantly higher on the General CEQ-R scale than the other groups, whereas the CFS and chronic pain groups scored higher than healthy controls on the Somatic CEQ-R. Somatic CEQ-R scores showed a significant decrease over the course of a pain management program, with a concomitant decrease in disability and depression scores. Further analyses showed the Somatic CEQ-R to be significantly related to self and symptom focusing, whereas the General CEQ-R was found to be significantly correlated with higher depression, lower self-esteem, and self focusing. The CEQ-R may be a useful instrument to examine the relationship between cognitive distortions and disability in a variety of illnesses, and to differentiate primary depression from overlapping somatic disorders.

摘要

本文报道了认知错误问卷(CEQ)的修订情况。最初开发的CEQ是用于测量慢性疼痛特有的认知扭曲,现已大幅缩短并适用于更广泛的躯体问题。修订后的认知错误问卷(CEQ-R)包含两个分量表:躯体——躯体体验特有的扭曲;以及一般——对日常生活事件的扭曲。对慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)组、抑郁症组、慢性疼痛组和健康对照组进行量表验证,证实CEQ-R可归为一般因素和躯体因素。两个分量表都具有较高的内部一致性和良好的重测信度。受试者对CEQ-R分数的反应模式表明,抑郁症组在一般CEQ-R量表上的得分显著高于其他组,而CFS组和慢性疼痛组在躯体CEQ-R上的得分高于健康对照组。在疼痛管理项目过程中,躯体CEQ-R分数显著下降,同时残疾和抑郁分数也随之下降。进一步分析表明,躯体CEQ-R与自我关注和症状关注显著相关,而一般CEQ-R与更高的抑郁、更低的自尊和自我关注显著相关。CEQ-R可能是一种有用的工具,可用于研究各种疾病中认知扭曲与残疾之间的关系,以及区分原发性抑郁症与重叠的躯体障碍。

相似文献

1
Cognitive distortions of somatic experiences: revision and validation of a measure.躯体体验的认知扭曲:一种测量方法的修订与验证
J Psychosom Res. 1997 Sep;43(3):293-306. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(97)00020-2.
2
Discriminating between chronic fatigue syndrome and depression: a cognitive analysis.区分慢性疲劳综合征与抑郁症:一项认知分析。
Psychol Med. 2001 Apr;31(3):469-79. doi: 10.1017/s0033291701003610.
3
Functional status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, other fatiguing illnesses, and healthy individuals.慢性疲劳综合征患者、其他疲劳性疾病患者及健康个体的功能状态。
Am J Med. 1996 Oct;101(4):364-70. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00234-3.
4
Cognitive distortion and depression in chronic pain: association with diagnosed disorders.慢性疼痛中的认知扭曲与抑郁:与已确诊疾病的关联
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Feb;62(1):195-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.62.1.195.
5
Information processing efficiency in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis.慢性疲劳综合征和多发性硬化症中的信息处理效率
Arch Neurol. 1993 Mar;50(3):301-4. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540030065016.
6
Attentional and interpretive bias towards illness-related information in chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review.慢性疲劳综合征中对疾病相关信息的注意力和解释偏差:一项系统综述。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;21(4):741-763. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12207.
7
Psychophysical distress and alexithymic traits in chronic fatigue syndrome with and without comorbid depression.慢性疲劳综合征伴或不伴共病抑郁的心理生理性困扰和述情障碍特征。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011 Oct-Dec;24(4):1017-25. doi: 10.1177/039463201102400419.
8
[Psychometric properties of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire].[《我如何思考问卷》法语版的心理测量学特性]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Development of a Japanese version of the Somatic Symptom Scale-8: Psychometric validity and internal consistency.《躯体症状量表-8》日文版的编制:心理测量效度与内部一致性
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar-Apr;45:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
10
The Classroom Environment Questionnaire (CEQ): Development and preliminary structural validity.课堂环境问卷(CEQ):编制与初步结构效度研究
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Oct;65(5):363-375. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12474. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive factors as mediators of the relationship between childhood trauma and depression symptoms: the mediating roles of cognitive overgeneralisation, rumination, and social problem-solving.认知因素作为童年创伤与抑郁症状之间关系的中介:认知过度概括、反刍思维和社会问题解决的中介作用。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2320041. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2320041. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
A comprehensive review on emerging trends in the dynamic evolution of digital addiction and depression.关于数字成瘾与抑郁症动态演变新趋势的综合综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1126815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126815. eCollection 2023.
3
Further validation of the Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for psychosis.
进一步验证精神病认知偏差问卷。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 19;22(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04203-8.
4
Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for psychosis.精神病认知偏差问卷。
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Mar;40(2):300-13. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs199. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
5
Quality and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures used in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a systematic review.慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎(CFS/ME)患者报告结局测量的质量和可接受性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):35-52. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9921-8. Epub 2011 May 18.
6
Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.个人基因组信息影响的考量:遗传学和基因组学专业人员的基因组分析研究
J Genet Couns. 2010 Aug;19(4):387-401. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9297-x. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
7
Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.糖尿病预测性基因检测的伦理问题。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;3(4):781-8. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300427.
8
Cold pressor pain sensitivity in monozygotic twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome.患慢性疲劳综合征的单卵双胞胎中的冷加压疼痛敏感性。
Pain Med. 2007 Apr;8(3):216-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00277.x.