Suppr超能文献

用氦氖激光、宽带和滤光光密度计测量的放射变色胶片剂量响应的比较。

Comparison of dose response of radiochromic film measured with He-Ne laser, broadband, and filtered light densitometers.

作者信息

Reinstein L E, Gluckman G R

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY at Stony Brook 11794-7028, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 1997 Sep;24(9):1531-3. doi: 10.1118/1.598043.

Abstract

Dose response curves for GAFChromic MD-55-2 film were measured using three different densitometer systems: a He-Ne laser densitometer, a broadband (white light) densitometer, and a filtered red light densitometer. These were found to differ significantly; the dose needed to achieve a net optical density of 1 (DNOD1) was greater than 100 Gy for the white light densitometer, 56 Gy for the He-Ne densitometer, and only 14.8 Gy for the filtered red light densitometer. This represents approximately a fourfold increase in response for the filtered red light versus the He-Ne laser densitometer, which is a significant improvement. For some patient prescriptions this enables us to achieve an accuracy and precision sufficient to verify daily dose to within 5%.

摘要

使用三种不同的密度计系统测量了GAFChromic MD - 55 - 2薄膜的剂量响应曲线:氦氖激光密度计、宽带(白光)密度计和滤光红光密度计。发现这些系统存在显著差异;白光密度计达到净光密度1(DNOD1)所需的剂量大于100 Gy,氦氖密度计为56 Gy,而滤光红光密度计仅为14.8 Gy。这表明滤光红光相对于氦氖激光密度计的响应增加了约四倍,这是一个显著的改进。对于一些患者处方,这使我们能够实现足够的准确度和精密度,将每日剂量验证在5%以内。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验