Reinstein L E, Gluckman G R
Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY at Stony Brook 11794-7028, USA.
Med Phys. 1997 Sep;24(9):1531-3. doi: 10.1118/1.598043.
Dose response curves for GAFChromic MD-55-2 film were measured using three different densitometer systems: a He-Ne laser densitometer, a broadband (white light) densitometer, and a filtered red light densitometer. These were found to differ significantly; the dose needed to achieve a net optical density of 1 (DNOD1) was greater than 100 Gy for the white light densitometer, 56 Gy for the He-Ne densitometer, and only 14.8 Gy for the filtered red light densitometer. This represents approximately a fourfold increase in response for the filtered red light versus the He-Ne laser densitometer, which is a significant improvement. For some patient prescriptions this enables us to achieve an accuracy and precision sufficient to verify daily dose to within 5%.
使用三种不同的密度计系统测量了GAFChromic MD - 55 - 2薄膜的剂量响应曲线:氦氖激光密度计、宽带(白光)密度计和滤光红光密度计。发现这些系统存在显著差异;白光密度计达到净光密度1(DNOD1)所需的剂量大于100 Gy,氦氖密度计为56 Gy,而滤光红光密度计仅为14.8 Gy。这表明滤光红光相对于氦氖激光密度计的响应增加了约四倍,这是一个显著的改进。对于一些患者处方,这使我们能够实现足够的准确度和精密度,将每日剂量验证在5%以内。