Suppr超能文献

治疗胃食管反流病症状:奥美拉唑与西沙必利的双盲比较

Treating the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a double-blind comparison of omeprazole and cisapride.

作者信息

Galmiche J P, Barthelemy P, Hamelin B

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Aug;11(4):765-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00185.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have specifically addressed the management of the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and there are no comparative data in this respect for acid pump inhibitors and prokinetic agents.

METHODS

Following endoscopy 424 patients presenting with heartburn as the predominant symptom of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomized to treatment with omeprazole 20 or 10 mg once daily, or cisapride 10 mg four times daily, in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicentre study. Symptoms and quality of life were assessed at 4 weeks. Patients still experiencing heartburn continued therapy for a further 4 weeks and the assessments were repeated.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, heartburn was resolved in 65% (95% CI: 57-73%), 56% (48-64%) and 41% (32%-49%) of patients treated, respectively, with omeprazole 20 mg and 10 mg once daily, and cisapride. Both omeprazole doses were significantly more effective than cisapride (P < 0.01). The same order of efficacy was observed regardless of the presence of erosive oesophagitis. Regurgitation and epigastric pain also improved to a greater degree with omeprazole than with cisapride. Quality of life was improved in all treatment groups, and the improvement in the reflux dimension of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) score was significantly different between groups (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole 20 or 10 mg once daily is significantly more effective than cisapride in the resolution of heartburn, regardless of the presence of erosive oesophagitis, and this is accompanied by an improvement in patient quality of life.

摘要

背景

很少有研究专门探讨胃食管反流病症状的管理,在这方面也没有关于酸泵抑制剂和促动力剂的对比数据。

方法

在一项双盲、双模拟、平行组、多中心研究中,424例以烧心为胃食管反流病主要症状的患者在接受内镜检查后,被随机分为每日一次服用20毫克或10毫克奥美拉唑组,或每日四次服用10毫克西沙必利组。在4周时评估症状和生活质量。仍有烧心症状的患者继续治疗4周并重复评估。

结果

4周时,每日一次服用20毫克和10毫克奥美拉唑以及服用西沙必利的患者中,烧心症状缓解的比例分别为65%(95%可信区间:57 - 73%)、56%(48 - 64%)和41%(32% - 49%)。两种剂量的奥美拉唑均比西沙必利显著更有效(P < 0.01)。无论是否存在糜烂性食管炎,均观察到相同的疗效顺序。与西沙必利相比,奥美拉唑对反流和上腹部疼痛的改善程度也更大。所有治疗组的生活质量均有所改善,且胃肠道症状评分量表(GSRS)反流维度得分的改善在组间有显著差异(P = 0.002)。

结论

无论是否存在糜烂性食管炎,每日一次服用20毫克或10毫克奥美拉唑在缓解烧心方面均比西沙必利显著更有效,同时患者的生活质量也得到改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验