Suppr超能文献

反流性食管炎症状的快速缓解:兰索拉唑与奥美拉唑的比较

Rapid symptom relief in reflux oesophagitis: a comparison of lansoprazole and omeprazole.

作者信息

Mee A S, Rowley J L

机构信息

Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, Berkshire, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Oct;10(5):757-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1996.56198000.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lansoprazole, a substituted benzimidazole, is a proton pump inhibitor which is highly effective in the control of 24-h intragastric acidity. The aim of this multicentre, randomized, double-blind study was to compare lansoprazole 30 mg once daily and omeprazole 20 mg once daily in the symptom relief and healing of patients with reflux oesophagitis.

METHODS

Six hundred and four patients with endoscopically proven oesophagitis and a recent history of heartburn were randomly assigned to receive lansoprazole 30 mg or omeprazole 20 mg daily for 4-8 weeks. Daily assessment of symptoms was made by the patient using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale. Clinical symptoms were evaluated at weeks 0, 1, 4 and 8. Endoscopic assessment of healing, defined by normalization of the oesophageal mucosal appearance, was made at weeks 4 and 8.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-two patients in the lansoprazole group and 283 patients in the omeprazole group were eligible for inclusion in the per protocol analysis. At 3 days, there was a significant improvement in daytime symptoms of heartburn for patients in the lansoprazole group compared with the omeprazole group (P = 0.05). A similar but non-significant trend was seen at 7 days (P = 0.18). Clinical assessment at 7 days demonstrated significant improvement in daytime epigastric pain in the lansoprazole group compared with the omeprazole group (P = 0.03), with a similar but non-significant trend in night-time epigastric pain (P = 0.07). Healing rates of oesophagitis at 4 and 8 weeks were 70 and 87%, respectively, with lansoprazole, and 63 and 82%, respectively, with omeprazole. Logistic regression analysis of the cumulative healing rates, which included baseline factors affecting outcome, resulted in an odds ratio of 1.46 (95% CI = 0.87-2.45), suggesting a higher chance of being healed with lansoprazole treatment compared with omeprazole treatment. A total of 615 adverse events were reported by 308 (51%) patients during the study period. The majority of events were mild in nature and the incidence was similar in both treatment groups. The most frequently reported events were headache, diarrhoea and nausea.

CONCLUSION

Lansoprazole provides greater symptom relief compared with omeprazole during the first week of treatment. Both treatments were effective in healing oesophagitis.

摘要

背景

兰索拉唑是一种取代苯并咪唑类质子泵抑制剂,对控制24小时胃内酸度非常有效。这项多中心、随机、双盲研究的目的是比较兰索拉唑30毫克每日一次和奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次对反流性食管炎患者症状缓解和愈合的效果。

方法

604例经内镜证实患有食管炎且近期有烧心病史的患者被随机分配,接受兰索拉唑30毫克或奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次治疗,为期4 - 8周。患者每天使用100毫米视觉模拟量表对症状进行评估。在第0、1、4和8周对临床症状进行评估。在第4和8周通过食管黏膜外观正常化对愈合情况进行内镜评估。

结果

兰索拉唑组282例患者和奥美拉唑组283例患者符合符合方案分析的纳入标准。在第3天,与奥美拉唑组相比,兰索拉唑组患者白天烧心症状有显著改善(P = 0.05)。在第7天观察到类似但无统计学意义的趋势(P = 0.18)。第7天的临床评估显示,与奥美拉唑组相比,兰索拉唑组白天上腹部疼痛有显著改善(P = 0.03),夜间上腹部疼痛有类似但无统计学意义的趋势(P = 0.07)。使用兰索拉唑治疗时,食管炎在第4周和第8周的愈合率分别为70%和87%,使用奥美拉唑治疗时分别为63%和82%。对累积愈合率进行逻辑回归分析,其中包括影响结果的基线因素,得出比值比为1.46(95%可信区间 = 0.87 - 2.45),表明与奥美拉唑治疗相比,兰索拉唑治疗愈合的可能性更高。在研究期间,308例(51%)患者共报告了615例不良事件。大多数事件性质轻微,两个治疗组的发生率相似。最常报告的事件是头痛、腹泻和恶心。

结论

在治疗的第一周,与奥美拉唑相比,兰索拉唑能更好地缓解症状。两种治疗方法对食管炎的愈合均有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验