Hatlebakk J G, Hyggen A, Madsen P H, Walle P O, Schulz T, Mowinckel P, Bernklev T, Berstad A
Department of Medicine, Haukeland Sykehus, University of Bergen, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.
BMJ. 1999 Aug 28;319(7209):550-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7209.550.
To compare the effects and tolerability of omeprazole and cisapride with that of placebo for control of heartburn in primary care patients.
Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study.
65 primary care practices in Norway.
483 untreated patients with complaints of heartburn >/=3 days a week, with at most grade 1 reflux oesophagitis.
Omeprazole 20 mg once daily, cisapride 20 mg twice daily, or placebo for 8 weeks.
Adequate control of heartburn, defined as </=1 day of the past 7 days with no more than mild heartburn, after 4 weeks of treatment.
In the all patients treated analysis, adequate control of heartburn was achieved in 71% of patients taking omeprazole, 22% taking cisapride, and 18% taking placebo after 4 weeks of treatment (omeprazole v cisapride and placebo, P<0.0001; cisapride v placebo, non-significant). Results were comparable in patients with or without reflux oesophagitis. In patients treated with omeprazole only, symptom control was achieved significantly more often in patients positive for Helicobacter pylori. Antacid use was 2-3 times greater in patients taking cisapride or placebo than in those taking omeprazole. Relief of non-reflux symptoms did not significantly differ between the three groups. Significantly more patients taking cisapride reported adverse events than those taking omeprazole or placebo.
Omeprazole 20 mg once daily was highly effective in relieving heartburn whereas cisapride 20 mg twice daily was not significantly more effective than placebo.
比较奥美拉唑、西沙必利与安慰剂对基层医疗患者烧心症状的控制效果及耐受性。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
挪威65家基层医疗机构。
483名未经治疗的患者,每周烧心症状≥3天,反流性食管炎程度至多为1级。
奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次,西沙必利20毫克每日两次,或安慰剂,治疗8周。
治疗4周后,烧心症状得到充分控制,定义为过去7天中烧心症状≤1天且程度不超过轻度。
在所有接受治疗的患者分析中,治疗4周后,服用奥美拉唑的患者中有71%烧心症状得到充分控制,服用西沙必利的患者中有22%,服用安慰剂的患者中有18%(奥美拉唑与西沙必利及安慰剂相比,P<0.0001;西沙必利与安慰剂相比,差异无统计学意义)。有无反流性食管炎的患者结果相似。仅接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者中,幽门螺杆菌阳性患者症状控制更常见。服用西沙必利或安慰剂的患者使用抗酸剂的频率是服用奥美拉唑患者的2 - 3倍。三组间非反流症状的缓解无显著差异。服用西沙必利的患者报告不良事件的人数显著多于服用奥美拉唑或安慰剂的患者。
奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次在缓解烧心症状方面非常有效,而西沙必利20毫克每日两次并不比安慰剂显著更有效。