Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中的胃灼热治疗:为期8周的随机双盲研究。

Heartburn treatment in primary care: randomised, double blind study for 8 weeks.

作者信息

Hatlebakk J G, Hyggen A, Madsen P H, Walle P O, Schulz T, Mowinckel P, Bernklev T, Berstad A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Haukeland Sykehus, University of Bergen, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ. 1999 Aug 28;319(7209):550-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7209.550.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects and tolerability of omeprazole and cisapride with that of placebo for control of heartburn in primary care patients.

DESIGN

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study.

SETTING

65 primary care practices in Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

483 untreated patients with complaints of heartburn >/=3 days a week, with at most grade 1 reflux oesophagitis.

INTERVENTIONS

Omeprazole 20 mg once daily, cisapride 20 mg twice daily, or placebo for 8 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adequate control of heartburn, defined as </=1 day of the past 7 days with no more than mild heartburn, after 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

In the all patients treated analysis, adequate control of heartburn was achieved in 71% of patients taking omeprazole, 22% taking cisapride, and 18% taking placebo after 4 weeks of treatment (omeprazole v cisapride and placebo, P<0.0001; cisapride v placebo, non-significant). Results were comparable in patients with or without reflux oesophagitis. In patients treated with omeprazole only, symptom control was achieved significantly more often in patients positive for Helicobacter pylori. Antacid use was 2-3 times greater in patients taking cisapride or placebo than in those taking omeprazole. Relief of non-reflux symptoms did not significantly differ between the three groups. Significantly more patients taking cisapride reported adverse events than those taking omeprazole or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole 20 mg once daily was highly effective in relieving heartburn whereas cisapride 20 mg twice daily was not significantly more effective than placebo.

摘要

目的

比较奥美拉唑、西沙必利与安慰剂对基层医疗患者烧心症状的控制效果及耐受性。

设计

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

地点

挪威65家基层医疗机构。

参与者

483名未经治疗的患者,每周烧心症状≥3天,反流性食管炎程度至多为1级。

干预措施

奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次,西沙必利20毫克每日两次,或安慰剂,治疗8周。

主要观察指标

治疗4周后,烧心症状得到充分控制,定义为过去7天中烧心症状≤1天且程度不超过轻度。

结果

在所有接受治疗的患者分析中,治疗4周后,服用奥美拉唑的患者中有71%烧心症状得到充分控制,服用西沙必利的患者中有22%,服用安慰剂的患者中有18%(奥美拉唑与西沙必利及安慰剂相比,P<0.0001;西沙必利与安慰剂相比,差异无统计学意义)。有无反流性食管炎的患者结果相似。仅接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者中,幽门螺杆菌阳性患者症状控制更常见。服用西沙必利或安慰剂的患者使用抗酸剂的频率是服用奥美拉唑患者的2 - 3倍。三组间非反流症状的缓解无显著差异。服用西沙必利的患者报告不良事件的人数显著多于服用奥美拉唑或安慰剂的患者。

结论

奥美拉唑20毫克每日一次在缓解烧心症状方面非常有效,而西沙必利20毫克每日两次并不比安慰剂显著更有效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Obesity as a risk factor for GERD in Japan.肥胖作为日本胃食管反流病的一个风险因素。
J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(1):57-62. doi: 10.1007/s00535-007-2128-7. Epub 2008 Feb 24.
7
Multimodal pain stimulations in patients with grade B oesophagitis.B级食管炎患者的多模式疼痛刺激
Gut. 2006 Jul;55(7):926-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.067769. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
8
Gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying, revisited.再探胃食管反流与胃排空
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2005 Jun;7(3):190-5. doi: 10.1007/s11894-005-0033-x.

本文引用的文献

3
Prokinetics in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. International symposium. Paris, France, 5 September 1996.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 Jan;10(1):87-93. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199801000-00016.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验