• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去除双眼线索会干扰视觉形式失认症患者抓握动作的校准。

The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia.

作者信息

Marotta J J, Behrmann M, Goodale M A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 1997 Aug;116(1):113-21. doi: 10.1007/pl00005731.

DOI:10.1007/pl00005731
PMID:9305820
Abstract

The present study tested the idea that the visuomotor systems mediating prehension do not have independent access to pictorial cues processed by perceptual mechanisms. Individuals with visual form agnosia, whose perceptual systems are compromised but who have intact visuomotor control, were examined to determine whether they could use pictorial scene cues to calibrate manual prehension when binocular information was removed. The removal of binocular cues produced considerable disruptions in size-constancy of grip aperture, which, combined with earlier observations in normal subjects, suggests that binocular cues are of primary importance in calibration of grasping. In the absence of binocular vision, normal subjects can use pictorial information, information that is severely compromised in individuals with visual form agnosia, to compute the distance (and thus the size) of the goal object. Thus, individuals with visual form agnosia must rely on a retinal image that remains uncalibrated, leading to inaccurate calibrations of grip aperture. The fact that these individuals scaled their grasp much less accurately under the monocular viewing condition, despite showing normal binocular grasping, suggests that pictorial cues to depth, which are presumably processed by mechanisms mediating our perception of objects and events in the world, can be accessed by visuomotor mechanisms only indirectly. These results, together with others, suggest that the visuomotor system 'prefers' to use binocular information and uses pictorial cues only as a last resort.

摘要

本研究验证了这样一种观点,即介导抓握动作的视觉运动系统无法独立获取由感知机制处理的图像线索。研究人员对患有视觉形式失认症的个体进行了检查,这些个体的感知系统受损,但视觉运动控制功能完好,目的是确定在去除双眼信息后,他们是否能够利用图像场景线索来校准手动抓握动作。去除双眼线索后,抓握孔径的大小恒常性出现了相当大的干扰,这与之前对正常受试者的观察结果相结合,表明双眼线索在抓握校准中至关重要。在没有双眼视觉的情况下,正常受试者可以利用图像信息(而患有视觉形式失认症的个体严重缺乏这种信息)来计算目标物体的距离(进而计算其大小)。因此,患有视觉形式失认症的个体必须依赖未经校准的视网膜图像,这导致抓握孔径的校准不准确。尽管这些个体在双眼抓握时表现正常,但在单眼观察条件下抓握动作的缩放准确性要低得多,这一事实表明,深度的图像线索(大概是由介导我们对世界中物体和事件感知的机制处理的)只能被视觉运动系统间接获取。这些结果以及其他结果表明,视觉运动系统“更喜欢”使用双眼信息,只有在万不得已时才使用图像线索。

相似文献

1
The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia.去除双眼线索会干扰视觉形式失认症患者抓握动作的校准。
Exp Brain Res. 1997 Aug;116(1):113-21. doi: 10.1007/pl00005731.
2
The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping.习得的图像线索在抓握动作的编程与控制中的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 1998 Aug;121(4):465-70. doi: 10.1007/s002210050482.
3
Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements.单眼视觉会导致在伸手抓握动作过程中,握力与抓握孔径缩放之间出现分离。
Curr Biol. 2002 Feb 5;12(3):237-40. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00682-0.
4
When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.在抓握过程中为何双眼比单眼更具优势:单眼观察与终点方差
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Oct;158(3):317-27. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1905-2. Epub 2004 May 26.
5
Motion parallax enables depth processing for action in a visual form agnosic when binocular vision is unavailable.当双眼视觉不可用时,运动视差能够以视觉形式对失认症中的动作进行深度处理。
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Dec;37(13):1505-10. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00063-9.
6
A comparison of visuomotor cue integration strategies for object placement and prehension.用于物体放置和抓握的视觉运动线索整合策略的比较。
Vis Neurosci. 2009 Jan-Feb;26(1):63-72. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080668. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
7
The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane. I. Effects of visual form agnosia.深度平面中物体的感知与抓握。I. 视觉失认症的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Dec;112(3):442-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00227950.
8
Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: no evidence for a binocular specialism.深度线索整合在抓取编程中:没有证据表明存在双眼专门化。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1246-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.047. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
9
The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension.头部运动在手动抓握控制中的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 1998 May;120(1):134-8. doi: 10.1007/s002210050386.
10
Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III).单眼和双眼距离线索:来自视觉失认症I(共三部分)的见解
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jul;139(2):127-36. doi: 10.1007/s002210000657.

引用本文的文献

1
Building egocentric models of local space from retinal input.从视网膜输入构建局部空间的自我中心模型。
Curr Biol. 2024 Dec 2;34(23):R1185-R1202. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.057.
2
Binocular Viewing Facilitates Size Constancy for Grasping and Manual Estimation.双眼观察有助于抓握和手动估计的大小恒常性。
Vision (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;6(2):23. doi: 10.3390/vision6020023.
3
Differentiation of Types of Visual Agnosia Using EEG.利用脑电图区分视觉失认症的类型
Vision (Basel). 2018 Dec 18;2(4):44. doi: 10.3390/vision2040044.
4
Embodied memories: Reviewing the role of the body in memory processes.具身记忆:回顾身体在记忆过程中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1747-1766. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01674-x.
5
Real-world size coding of solid objects, but not 2-D or 3-D images, in visual agnosia patients with bilateral ventral lesions.在双侧腹侧病变的视觉失认症患者中,对实体物体进行真实世界大小编码,但不能对 2-D 或 3-D 图像进行编码。
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:555-568. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
6
Does unconscious perception really exist? Continuing the ASSC20 debate.无意识知觉真的存在吗?延续在第20届意识科学大会上的辩论。
Neurosci Conscious. 2017 Sep 6;2017(1):nix015. doi: 10.1093/nc/nix015. eCollection 2017.
7
Viewing geometry determines the contribution of binocular vision to the online control of grasping.观察几何决定了双眼视觉对抓握在线控制的贡献。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Dec;235(12):3631-3643. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5087-0. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
8
How do the two visual streams interact with each other?这两条视觉信息流是如何相互作用的?
Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1297-1308. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4917-4. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
9
Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond.关于概念本质的争论:符号、具身化及其他。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):941-58. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1045-2.
10
Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.实时视觉、触觉线索与视觉失认症:从“自然”抓握任务中去除触觉反馈会引发类似手势的抓握动作。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 6;9:216. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00216. eCollection 2015.