评估农业引种风险的标准方案。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions.

作者信息

Barton J, Crandon J, Kennedy D, Miller H

机构信息

Stanford University, CA, USA.

出版信息

Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Sep;15(9):845-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt0997-845.

DOI:10.1038/nbt0997-845

PMID:9306396

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions.评估农业引种风险的标准方案。

Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Sep;15(9):845-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt0997-845.

Agricultural biotech: the rice squad.农业生物技术：水稻团队。

Nature. 2002 Apr 11;416(6881):576-8. doi: 10.1038/416576a.

Opinion: EU biotech regulations stall agricultural improvements in developing countries.观点：欧盟的生物技术法规阻碍了发展中国家的农业发展。

Biotechnol J. 2007 Jun;2(6):670. doi: 10.1002/biot.200790065.

Enhancing the crops to feed the poor.改良农作物以养活贫困人口。

Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):678-84. doi: 10.1038/nature01015.

Fuelling the 9 billion.

Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Oct;26(10):1068-70. doi: 10.1038/nbt1008-1068.

Food: Inside the hothouses of industry.食物：在工业温室之中。

Nature. 2010 Jul 29;466(7306):548-51. doi: 10.1038/466548a.

Long-term effect of GM crops serves up food for thought.转基因作物的长期影响发人深省。

Nature. 1999 Apr 22;398(6729):651-6. doi: 10.1038/19381.

The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology.反对农业生物技术的代价高昂的好处。

N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 May 22.

The future of transgenic plants in developing countries.

Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2001 Dec;47(8):1343-51.

Biotechnology and food security for the 21st century: a real-world perspective.21世纪的生物技术与粮食安全：现实视角

Nat Biotechnol. 1998 May;16(5):399-400. doi: 10.1038/nbt0598-399.

引用本文的文献

The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding.不断发展的欧盟精准育种监管框架。

Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Mar;132(3):569-573. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3200-9. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

Recovering the Original Intentions of Risk Assessment and Management of Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union.恢复欧盟转基因生物风险评估与管理的初衷。

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 May 4;6:52. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00052. eCollection 2018.

The EU legislation on "GMOs" between nonsense and protectionism: An ongoing Schumpeterian chain of public choices.欧盟关于“转基因生物”的立法：在无稽之谈与保护主义之间——一场持续不断的熊彼特式公共选择链条。

GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):57-73. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1270488. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing: The use of genome editing technologies in plant breeding requires a novel regulatory approach for new plant varieties that involves farmers.编辑欧盟法规以适应植物基因组编辑：在植物育种中使用基因组编辑技术需要一种涉及农民的针对新植物品种的新型监管方法。

EMBO Rep. 2016 Oct;17(10):1365-1369. doi: 10.15252/embr.201643099. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms.一种基于风险的转基因生物监管方法。

Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May 6;34(5):493-503. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3568.

Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.基因组编辑的监管障碍：不同监管背景下基于过程与基于产品的方法

Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Jul;35(7):1493-506. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1990-2. Epub 2016 May 3.

The meaningless pseudo-category of "GMOs": The trouble with the "new techniques" for genetically modifying crops demonstrates the illogical process-based definition of GMOs in EU regulation.“转基因生物”这一毫无意义的伪类别：转基因作物“新技术”的问题揭示了欧盟法规中基于过程的转基因生物定义的不合逻辑之处。

EMBO Rep. 2016 Jan;17(1):10-3. doi: 10.15252/embr.201541385. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

Safety, risk and the precautionary principle: rethinking precautionary approaches to the regulation of transgenic plants.安全、风险与预防原则：反思转基因植物监管的预防性方法

Transgenic Res. 2003 Dec;12(6):639-47. doi: 10.1023/b:trag.0000005157.45046.8e.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验