• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对同音异义词的理解:一项发展性研究。

Children's interpretations of homonyms: a developmental study.

作者信息

Mazzocco M M

机构信息

Arizona State University, USA.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 1997 Jun;24(2):441-67. doi: 10.1017/s0305000997003103.

DOI:10.1017/s0305000997003103
PMID:9308427
Abstract

The effect of homonymity on children's use of semantic context to derive word meaning was examined in two studies. Participants were presented with stories that included three types of key words: nonsense words, familiar words used accurately, and homonymous words. Thirty-two preschoolers aged 3;7 to 5;4, 32 second graders aged 7;1 to 8;8, and 16 college students in Study 1 indicated the keys words' meaning by selecting one of six possible illustrations per key word. In Study 2, 16 toddlers aged 2;9 to 3;3, 32 preschoolers aged 4;0 to 4;11, 32 second graders aged 7;0 to 8;11, and 32 fifth graders aged 10;1 to 11;8 indicated key word meanings either by enacting each story with paper dolls or by selecting one of six possible illustrations. Word type and age, but not response mode, affected children's interpretations. Children from all four age groups made fewer contextually based interpretations of homonymous words than of nonsense words. Fifth graders and adults made more contextually based (rather than literal) interpretations of homonymous words than did younger children. The results suggest that homonymity is a powerful inhibitor of children's tendency to derive a meaning for a new word from context.

摘要

两项研究考察了同音异义现象对儿童利用语义语境推导词义的影响。给参与者呈现包含三种关键词类型的故事:无意义词、准确使用的常用词和同音异义词。研究1中,32名3岁7个月至5岁4个月的学龄前儿童、32名7岁1个月至8岁8个月的二年级学生和16名大学生通过从每个关键词的六个可能插图中选择一个来指出关键词的含义。在研究2中,16名2岁9个月至3岁3个月的幼儿、32名4岁0个月至4岁11个月的学龄前儿童、32名7岁0个月至8岁11个月的二年级学生和32名10岁1个月至11岁8个月的五年级学生通过用纸娃娃表演每个故事或从六个可能插图中选择一个来指出关键词的含义。词的类型和年龄而非反应方式影响了儿童的解释。所有四个年龄组的儿童对同音异义词基于语境的解释都比对无意义词的少。五年级学生和成年人对同音异义词基于语境(而非字面)的解释比年幼的儿童更多。结果表明,同音异义现象是儿童从语境中推导新词含义倾向的有力抑制因素。

相似文献

1
Children's interpretations of homonyms: a developmental study.儿童对同音异义词的理解:一项发展性研究。
J Child Lang. 1997 Jun;24(2):441-67. doi: 10.1017/s0305000997003103.
2
Possible explanations for children's literal interpretations of homonyms.
J Child Lang. 2003 Nov;30(4):879-904. doi: 10.1017/s0305000903005786.
3
Nine- to twelve-year olds' metalinguistic awareness of homonymy.9 至 12 岁儿童对同形异义词的元语言意识。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Jan-Feb;45(1):121-8. doi: 10.3109/13682820902745446.
4
Developmental changes in indicators that literal interpretations of homonyms are associated with conflict.
J Child Lang. 1999 Jun;26(2):393-417. doi: 10.1017/s0305000999003773.
5
Children's hypotheses about word meanings: is there a basic level constraint?儿童关于词义的假设:是否存在基本层次限制?
J Exp Child Psychol. 1994 Feb;57(1):108-38. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1994.1006.
6
Semantic analyzability in children's understanding of idioms.儿童对习语理解中的语义可分析性
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Jun;34(3):613-20. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3403.613.
7
Semantic constraints on word learning: proper names and adjectives.词汇学习中的语义限制:专有名词和形容词。
Child Dev. 1994 Oct;65(5):1299-317. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00818.x.
8
Reading comprehension and understanding idiomatic expressions: a developmental study.阅读理解与习语理解:一项发展性研究。
Brain Lang. 2004 Dec;91(3):303-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.04.002.
9
Determining that a label is kind-referring: factors that influence children's and adults' novel word extensions.判断标签是否具有指代关系:影响儿童和成人新单词扩展的因素。
J Child Lang. 2010 Nov;37(5):1007-26. doi: 10.1017/S0305000909990134. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
10
With Some Help From Others' Hands: Iconic Gesture Helps Semantic Learning in Children With Specific Language Impairment.借助他人之手:标志性手势有助于特定语言障碍儿童的语义学习。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Nov 9;60(11):3213-3225. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0004.

引用本文的文献

1
Repetition, but not acoustic differentiation, facilitates pseudohomophone learning by children.重复而非语音辨别,有助于儿童学习准同音字。
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(4):475-484. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1999244. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
Learning new meanings for known words: Perturbation of original meanings and retention of new meanings.学习已知单词的新含义:原有含义的扰动与新含义的保留。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):130-144. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0855-z.
3
Learning new meanings for known words: Biphasic effects of prior knowledge.
学习已知单词的新含义:先验知识的双相效应。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(5):637-649. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1252050. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
Token Frequency Effects in Homophone Production: An Elicitation Study.同音异形词生成中的词频效应:一项诱发研究。
Lang Speech. 2018 Sep;61(3):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0023830917737108. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
Are Homophones Acoustically Distinguished in Child-Directed Speech?在儿童导向言语中,同音异义词在语音上有区别吗?
Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(3):262-273. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1246248. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
The Inhibitory Mechanism in Learning Ambiguous Words in a Second Language.第二语言中学习歧义词汇的抑制机制
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 27;8:636. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00636. eCollection 2017.
7
The effect of homonymy on learning correctly articulated versus misarticulated words.同音异义词对正确发音与错误发音单词学习的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):694-707. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0122). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
8
Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1-9.1-9 年级正常发育作家的拼写错误的语言模式分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1587-99. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0335). Epub 2012 Apr 3.
9
A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency.同音词与新单词学习的比较:音位结构概率和词频的作用。
J Child Lang. 2005 Nov;32(4):827-53. doi: 10.1017/s0305000905007099.
10
Cognitive control and parsing: reexamining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension.认知控制与句法分析:重新审视布洛卡区在句子理解中的作用。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Sep;5(3):263-81. doi: 10.3758/cabn.5.3.263.