• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同音异形词生成中的词频效应:一项诱发研究。

Token Frequency Effects in Homophone Production: An Elicitation Study.

作者信息

Conwell Erin

机构信息

North Dakota State University, USA.

出版信息

Lang Speech. 2018 Sep;61(3):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0023830917737108. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1177/0023830917737108
PMID:29096575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6014932/
Abstract

In natural production, adults differentiate homophones prosodically as a function of the frequency of their intended meaning. This study compares adult and child productions of homophones to determine whether prosodic differentiation of homophones changes over development. Using a picture-based story-completion paradigm, isolated tokens of homophones were elicited from English-learning children and adult native English speakers. These tokens were measured for duration, vowel duration, pitch, pitch range, and vowel quality. Results indicate that less frequent meanings of homophones are longer in duration than their more frequent counterparts in both adults and children. No other measurement differed as a function of meaning frequency. As speakers of all ages produce longer tokens of lower frequency homophones, homophone differentiation does not change over development, but is included in children's early lexicons. These findings indicate that production planning processes alone may not fully account for differences in homophone duration, but rather that the differences could be learned and represented from experience even in the early stages of lexical acquisition.

摘要

在自然产出中,成年人会根据同音异形词预期含义的出现频率,从韵律上区分这些词。本研究比较了成年人和儿童对同音异形词的产出,以确定同音异形词的韵律区分在发育过程中是否会发生变化。使用基于图片的故事完成范式,从学习英语的儿童和以英语为母语的成年 speakers 中引出同音异形词的孤立 tokens。对这些 tokens 进行时长、元音时长、音高、音高范围和元音质量的测量。结果表明,在成年人和儿童中,同音异形词中出现频率较低的含义在时长上比出现频率较高的对应词更长。没有其他测量结果因含义频率而有所不同。由于所有年龄段的 speakers 都会产出低频同音异形词的更长 tokens,同音异形词的区分在发育过程中不会改变,而是包含在儿童早期的词汇表中。这些发现表明,仅生产计划过程可能无法完全解释同音异形词时长的差异,而是这些差异甚至在词汇习得的早期阶段就可以从经验中学习和体现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0625/6014932/7d7f6cd48165/nihms974958f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0625/6014932/785661f12a4d/nihms974958f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0625/6014932/7d7f6cd48165/nihms974958f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0625/6014932/785661f12a4d/nihms974958f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0625/6014932/7d7f6cd48165/nihms974958f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Token Frequency Effects in Homophone Production: An Elicitation Study.同音异形词生成中的词频效应:一项诱发研究。
Lang Speech. 2018 Sep;61(3):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0023830917737108. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Are Homophones Acoustically Distinguished in Child-Directed Speech?在儿童导向言语中,同音异义词在语音上有区别吗?
Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(3):262-273. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1246248. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
3
The role of lexical expertise in reading homophones.词汇专业知识在阅读同音异形词中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(7):1302-21. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1062528. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
4
Acquisition of speech rhythm in first language.第一语言中言语节奏的习得。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Sep;138(3):EL199-204. doi: 10.1121/1.4929616.
5
The specific-word frequency effect in speech production: evidence from Spanish and French.言语产生中的特定词频效应:来自西班牙语和法语的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Apr;63(4):750-71. doi: 10.1080/17470210903121663. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
6
Prosodic exaggeration within infant-directed speech: Consequences for vowel learnability.婴儿指向性言语中的韵律夸张:对元音可学性的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 May;141(5):3070. doi: 10.1121/1.4982246.
7
The influence of linguistic context on young children's understanding of homophonic words.语言语境对幼儿同音词理解的影响。
J Child Lang. 1991 Jun;18(2):459-67. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900011168.
8
Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: does orthography matter?言语产生中的同形和异形同音词:正字法重要吗?
Cortex. 2008 Jun;44(6):683-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
9
The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.同音异形词的表征:来自干扰项频率效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1360-71. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1360.
10
How do phonology and orthography feed back to influence syntactic encoding in language production? Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin.音韵和正字法如何反馈影响语言产生中的句法编码?来自汉语结构启动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Nov;73(11):1807-1819. doi: 10.1177/1747021820932125. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental consistency in the use of subphonemic information during real-time sentence processing.实时句子处理过程中次音位信息使用的发展一致性。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2023;38(6):860-871. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2159993. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
2
Repetition, but not acoustic differentiation, facilitates pseudohomophone learning by children.重复而非语音辨别,有助于儿童学习准同音字。
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(4):475-484. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1999244. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Exploring Variability in Compound Tensification in Seoul Korean.

本文引用的文献

1
Is It a Noun or Is It a Verb? Resolving the Ambicategoricality Problem.它是名词还是动词?解决兼类词问题。
Lang Learn Dev. 2012;8(2):87-112. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2011.580236. Epub 2012 May 30.
2
Are Homophones Acoustically Distinguished in Child-Directed Speech?在儿童导向言语中,同音异义词在语音上有区别吗?
Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(3):262-273. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1246248. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
3
Prosodic disambiguation of noun/verb homophones in child-directed speech.儿童导向言语中名词/动词同音异义词的韵律消歧
探索首尔韩语中复合强化的变异性。
Lang Speech. 2023 Mar;66(1):214-245. doi: 10.1177/00238309221095479. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
4
Sorry, Not Sorry: The independent role of multiple phonetic cues in signaling the difference between two word meanings.抱歉,并非抱歉:多重语音线索在提示两个词义差异方面的独立作用。
Lang Speech. 2022 Mar;65(1):143-172. doi: 10.1177/0023830921988975. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
J Child Lang. 2017 May;44(3):734-751. doi: 10.1017/S030500091600009X. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
4
Early Word Comprehension in Infants: Replication and Extension.婴儿早期的词汇理解:重复与拓展
Lang Learn Dev. 2015;11(4):369-380. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2014.979387. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
5
Neural responses to category ambiguous words.对类别模糊词的神经反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Mar;69:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.036. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
6
How words can and cannot be learned by observation.通过观察可以和不能学习单词的方式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 31;108(22):9014-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105040108. Epub 2011 May 16.
7
Vowel acoustic space development in children: a synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data.儿童元音声学空间的发展:声学与解剖学数据的综合分析
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Dec;50(6):1510-45. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/104).
8
Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.清晰语音和会话语音中的说话者差异:元音的声学特征
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1241-55. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/087).
9
Word-minimality, epenthesis and coda licensing in the early acquisition of English.早期英语习得中的词素最小化、插入音与韵尾许可
Lang Speech. 2006;49(Pt 2):137-74. doi: 10.1177/00238309060490020201.
10
A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency.同音词与新单词学习的比较:音位结构概率和词频的作用。
J Child Lang. 2005 Nov;32(4):827-53. doi: 10.1017/s0305000905007099.