Suppr超能文献

1-9 年级正常发育作家的拼写错误的语言模式分析。

Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1-9.

机构信息

University of South Florida, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1587-99. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0335). Epub 2012 Apr 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A mixed-methods approach, evaluating triple word-form theory, was used to describe linguistic patterns of misspellings.

METHOD

Spelling errors were taken from narrative and expository writing samples provided by 888 typically developing students in Grades 1-9. Errors were coded by category (phonological, orthographic, and morphological) and specific linguistic feature affected. Grade-level effects were analyzed with trend analysis. Qualitative analyses determined frequent error types and how use of specific linguistic features varied across grades.

RESULTS

Phonological, orthographic, and morphological errors were noted across all grades, but orthographic errors predominated. Linear trends revealed developmental shifts in error proportions for the orthographic and morphological categories between Grades 4 and 5. Similar error types were noted across age groups, but the nature of linguistic feature error changed with age.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple word-form theory was supported. By Grade 1, orthographic errors predominated, and phonological and morphological error patterns were evident. Morphological errors increased in relative frequency in older students, probably due to a combination of word-formation issues and vocabulary growth. These patterns suggest that normal spelling development reflects nonlinear growth and that it takes a long time to develop a robust orthographic lexicon that coordinates phonology, orthography, and morphology and supports word-specific, conventional spelling.

摘要

目的

采用混合方法评估三词词形理论,描述拼写错误的语言模式。

方法

从 888 名 1 至 9 年级正常发育学生的叙事和说明文写作样本中提取拼写错误。错误按类别(语音、正字法和形态)和受影响的特定语言特征进行编码。用趋势分析分析年级效应。定性分析确定了常见的错误类型以及特定语言特征在各年级的使用情况。

结果

各年级均出现语音、正字法和形态错误,但正字法错误居多。线性趋势显示,在 4 年级和 5 年级之间,正字法和形态类别的错误比例发生了发展性转变。不同年龄组注意到了相似的错误类型,但语言特征错误的性质随年龄而变化。

结论

三词词形理论得到了支持。到 1 年级时,正字法错误居多,且出现语音和形态错误模式。年龄较大的学生中形态错误的相对频率增加,可能是由于构词问题和词汇量增长的综合作用。这些模式表明,正常的拼写发展反映了非线性的增长,并且需要很长时间才能发展出一个强大的正字法词汇,协调语音、正字法和形态,并支持特定于单词的常规拼写。

相似文献

1
Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1-9.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1587-99. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0335). Epub 2012 Apr 3.
2
Spelling Errors in French Elementary School Students: A Linguistic Analysis.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Sep 12;65(9):3456-3470. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00507. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3
The relation of linguistic awareness and vocabulary to word reading and spelling for first-grade students participating in response to intervention.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013 Oct;44(4):337-47. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0013). Epub 2013 Jul 5.
6
A Multilinguistic Approach to Evaluating Student Spelling in Writing Samples.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jul 5;49(3):509-523. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0095.
7
Linguistic Contributions to Word-Level Spelling Accuracy in Elementary School Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 May 27;28(2):599-611. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0064. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Orthographic facilitation in oral vocabulary acquisition.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Oct;62(10):1948-66. doi: 10.1080/17470210802696104. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
9
Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2010 Apr;39(2):141-63. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6.
10

引用本文的文献

1
-A Dictation Assessment Instrument with Automatic Analysis.
Children (Basel). 2025 Jun 14;12(6):774. doi: 10.3390/children12060774.
2
Comparing the effects of typing and handwriting on spelling performance in school.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03369-x.
4
Written Language Characteristics of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Terms of the Components of the Language.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Dec;52(6):2093-2117. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09990-z. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
5
Language Variation in the Writing of African American Students: Factors Predicting Reading Achievement.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Nov 4;30(6):2653-2667. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00263. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
The Contribution of Word-, Sentence-, and Discourse-Level Abilities on Writing Performance: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 3;12:668139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668139. eCollection 2021.
7
Average One Year Change in Lexical Measures of Written Narratives for School Age Students.
Read Writ Q. 2020;36(3):260-277. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2019.1635544. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
An Exploration of Early Spelling in Kindergarten Children With Hearing Loss.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Jan 19;52(1):304-316. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00041. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
Distinguishing Syntactic Markers From Morphological Markers. A Cross-Linguistic Comparison.
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:2082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02082. eCollection 2020.
10
A Multilinguistic Spelling Analysis of Children who are Hard of Hearing.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021 Jan 1;26(1):112-129. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enaa021.

本文引用的文献

1
Spelling Development and Disability: The Importance of Linguistic Factors.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2001 Jul 1;32(3):172-181. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/016).
2
Fourth graders' sensitivity to morphological context in spelling.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2011 Jun;65(2):109-14. doi: 10.1037/a0021852.
3
Development in children's sensitivity to the role of derivations in spelling.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2011 Jun;65(2):133-9. doi: 10.1037/a0018569.
4
Mastering inflectional suffixes: a longitudinal study of beginning writers' spellings*.
J Child Lang. 2011 Jun;38(3):533-53. doi: 10.1017/S030500091000022X. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
5
Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2010 Apr;39(2):141-63. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6.
6
Highlights of Programmatic, Interdisciplinary Research on Writing.
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2009 May;24(2):69-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00281.x.
7
The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2009 Jul;40(3):286-98. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0001).
9
The metric matters: determining the extent of children's knowledge of morphological spelling regularities.
Dev Sci. 2008 May;11(3):396-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00684.x.
10
The representation of morphologically complex words in the developing lexicon.
J Child Lang. 2008 May;35(2):453-65. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008525.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验