• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Is regularization determined by semantics, or grammar, or both? Comments on Kim, Marcus, Pinker, Hollander & Coppola (1994).

作者信息

Shirai Y

机构信息

Department of Modern Languages, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-4701, USA.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 1997 Jun;24(2):495-501.

PMID:9308429
Abstract

Kim, Marcus, Pinker, Hollander & Coppola (1994) argue that the preference children and adults show for regular inflection for verbs and nouns with novel meanings (e.g. The batter flew/flied out to centre field) should be attributed to their grammatically based sensitivity to the derivations of these verbs and nouns. However, it could also be that speakers avoid the use of irregular forms to avoid conveying the conventional meaning associated with the irregular form, such as literally flying to centre field. This paper, in reply to Kim et al. (1994), reinterprets their findings and argues for a semantic/functional account, without resorting to a grammatical account.

摘要

相似文献

1
Is regularization determined by semantics, or grammar, or both? Comments on Kim, Marcus, Pinker, Hollander & Coppola (1994).
J Child Lang. 1997 Jun;24(2):495-501.
2
Can word formation be understood or understanded by semantics alone?词的构成能仅通过语义来理解吗? (注:原句中“understanded”使用错误,正确形式应为“understood” )
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Feb;56(1):30-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 May 10.
3
The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors.动词语义类别和动词频率(固化程度)对儿童和成人关于论元结构过度泛化错误的分级判断的影响。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):87-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.015. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
4
German inflection: the exception that proves the rule.德语词形变化:证明规则的例外情况。
Cogn Psychol. 1995 Dec;29(3):189-256. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1015.
5
Grammatical dissociation during acquired childhood aphasia.儿童获得性失语症中的语法分离现象。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Dec;51(12):999-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03314.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
6
German inflection: single route or dual route?德语词形变化:单一路径还是双重路径?
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Dec;41(4):313-60. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0737.
7
Neural representations of nouns and verbs in Chinese: an fMRI study.汉语中名词和动词的神经表征:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1533-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.044.
8
The role of semantic context and memory in the acquisition of novel nouns.语义语境和记忆在新名词习得中的作用。
Child Dev. 1998 Oct;69(5):1330-44.
9
Priming nouns and verbs: differential influences of semantic and grammatical cues in the two cerebral hemispheres.启动名词和动词:语义和语法线索在两个大脑半球中的不同影响。
Brain Lang. 2006 Apr;97(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
10
Sensitivity of children's inflection to grammatical structure.儿童词形变化对语法结构的敏感性。
J Child Lang. 1994 Feb;21(1):173-209. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900008710.

引用本文的文献

1
Lexical Semantics and Irregular Inflection.词汇语义学与不规则词形变化
Lang Cogn Process. 2010 Dec 1;25(10):1411-1461. doi: 10.1080/01690961003589476.
2
The role of meaning in past-tense inflection: evidence from polysemy and denominal derivation.意义在过去式屈折变化中的作用:来自一词多义及名词派生的证据。
Cognition. 2007 Jul;104(1):150-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jul 12.