Lee V S, Spritzer C E, Carroll B A, Pool L G, Bernstein M A, Heinle S K, MacFall J R
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Oct;169(4):1125-31. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308476.
Our purpose was to assess the accuracy of measurements of flow velocity and volume flow rate in an in vitro phantom and in healthy human volunteers using a cardiac-gated, segmented K-space, fast cine phase-contrast (PC) MR imaging technique with view sharing (fast PC). We compared this method with conventional cine PC MR imaging and Doppler sonography.
Pulsatile flow was generated in a flow phantom that consisted of a cylindric tube having various degrees of tapered stenosis. Phase-encoded velocity maps were obtained using cine PC and fast PC MR imaging. Doppler sonography was also performed. Measurements of aortic and pulmonary artery peak systolic and minimum diastolic velocity and volume flow rate were then compared in eight healthy volunteers using the three imaging techniques.
We found excellent agreement between fast PC and cine PC measurements of peak systolic velocity when regions of interest were drawn to exclude vessel margins (r > .99 for phantom studies, and r = .80 for human studies). Correlation between minimum diastolic velocity measurements by MR imaging was limited by noise that resulted from high encoding velocity settings. However, such correlation improved with signal averaging. When compared with predicted values of volume flow rates, both cine PC (r > .99) and fast PC (r = .97) MR imaging were more accurate than Doppler sonography (r = .78) in vitro. Measurements of cardiac output were adversely affected by low signal to noise, especially during diastole; estimates based on systolic forward flow resulted in better agreement between the two MR imaging methods.
Fast PC MR flow quantification may prove to be a useful adjunct to routine MR studies for measurements of peak flow velocity. However, estimates of volume flow rate using fast PC MR imaging are limited because of increased noise during low diastolic flow as well as edge artifacts.
我们的目的是使用具有视图共享功能的心脏门控、分段K空间、快速电影相位对比(PC)磁共振成像技术(快速PC),评估体外模型和健康人类志愿者中流速和容积流率测量的准确性。我们将该方法与传统电影PC磁共振成像和多普勒超声检查进行了比较。
在一个由具有不同程度锥形狭窄的圆柱管组成的流动模型中产生脉动流。使用电影PC和快速PC磁共振成像获得相位编码速度图。还进行了多普勒超声检查。然后使用这三种成像技术比较了八名健康志愿者的主动脉和肺动脉收缩期峰值和舒张期最小速度以及容积流率的测量值。
当绘制感兴趣区域以排除血管边缘时,我们发现快速PC和电影PC测量的收缩期峰值速度之间具有极好的一致性(模型研究中r>.99,人体研究中r =.80)。磁共振成像测量的舒张期最小速度之间的相关性受到高编码速度设置导致的噪声限制。然而,通过信号平均这种相关性得到了改善。与容积流率的预测值相比,电影PC(r>.99)和快速PC(r =.97)磁共振成像在体外比多普勒超声检查(r =.78)更准确。心输出量的测量受到低信噪比的不利影响,尤其是在舒张期;基于收缩期正向血流的估计导致两种磁共振成像方法之间的一致性更好。
快速PC磁共振血流定量可能被证明是常规磁共振研究中测量峰值流速的有用辅助手段。然而,由于舒张期低血流期间噪声增加以及边缘伪影,使用快速PC磁共振成像估计容积流率受到限制。