Katerndahl D A, Realini J P
Department of Family Practice, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
Fam Med. 1997 Sep;29(8):563-7.
This study identified associations between panic states and family 1) structure, 2) functioning, and 3) stress/support.
Ninety-seven adults with panic disorder or infrequent panic attacks, based on the structured Clinical Interview of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Third Edition, Revised, were matched to 97 subjects without panic symptoms based on age, gender, and race/ethnicity. All subjects completed a structured interview concerning health care use by family members and family characteristics. Family functioning was assessed using the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales, and family stress/support were assessed using the Duke Social Support and Stress Scales.
Although groups did not differ in either perceived or ideal family cohesion or adaptability, the panic group perceived their families as more dysfunctional and reported higher levels of family stress and total stress but lower levels of support, including family support, nonfamily support, and total support.
Subjects with panic symptoms have families with high levels of dysfunction and stress but low levels of support. Increased family dysfunction may be due to comorbid substance abuse.
本研究确定了惊恐状态与家庭的1)结构、2)功能以及3)压力/支持之间的关联。
根据《诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版的结构化临床访谈,97名患有惊恐障碍或偶尔惊恐发作的成年人,按照年龄、性别和种族/民族与97名无惊恐症状的受试者进行匹配。所有受试者都完成了一项关于家庭成员医疗保健使用情况和家庭特征的结构化访谈。家庭功能使用家庭适应性和凝聚力评估量表进行评估,家庭压力/支持使用杜克社会支持和压力量表进行评估。
尽管两组在感知到的或理想的家庭凝聚力或适应性方面没有差异,但惊恐组认为他们的家庭功能失调更严重,报告的家庭压力和总压力水平更高,但支持水平更低,包括家庭支持、非家庭支持和总支持。
有惊恐症状的受试者的家庭功能失调程度高、压力大但支持少。家庭功能失调加剧可能是由于合并物质滥用。