Suppr超能文献

比较用于检测碎牛肉中沙门氏菌的单步沙门氏菌检测法、1-2 检测法和改良半固体 Rappaport-Vassiliadis 培养基的检测程序。

A comparison of procedures involving single step Salmonella, 1-2 Test, and modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for detection of Salmonella in ground beef.

作者信息

Afflu L, Gyles C L

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 1997 Jul 22;37(2-3):241-4. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(97)00076-7.

Abstract

Procedures involving Single Step Salmonella (SSS), 1-2 Test, and Modified Semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis Medium (MSRV) were compared for their speed and sensitivity in detection of Salmonella in ground beef contaminated with one isolate of each of five Salmonella serotypes. Inocula of 10, 10(2) and 10(3) CFU/g of ground beef were used. When pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water and selective enrichment in tetrathionate broth were used, SSS and MSRV detected all five species of Salmonella at all levels of contamination, whereas the 1-2 Test was positive in 0, 12, and 15 of 15 tests at 10, 10(2) and 10(3) CFU/g, respectively. When only pre-enrichment was used, the results with MSRV were unchanged but the SSS test failed to detect S. typhimurium. Thus, with pre-enrichment the MSRV and SSS procedures were equally sensitive and both produced a result on the third day. The 1-2 Test was less sensitive and slower, with results available on day-4. The MSRV protocol was best overall.

摘要

对涉及单步沙门氏菌(SSS)、1-2检测法以及改良半固体Rappaport-Vassiliadis培养基(MSRV)的检测程序,就其在检测被5种沙门氏菌血清型中的每一种的一个分离株污染的绞碎牛肉中沙门氏菌的速度和灵敏度进行了比较。使用了每克绞碎牛肉含10、10²和10³CFU的接种物。当采用在缓冲蛋白胨水中进行预增菌以及在四硫磺酸盐肉汤中进行选择性增菌时,SSS和MSRV在所有污染水平下均检测到了所有5种沙门氏菌,而1-2检测法在每克含10、10²和10³CFU时,分别在15次检测中的0次、12次和15次呈阳性。当仅使用预增菌时,MSRV的结果未变,但SSS检测法未能检测到鼠伤寒沙门氏菌。因此,采用预增菌时,MSRV和SSS程序同样灵敏,且均在第三天得出结果。1-2检测法灵敏度较低且速度较慢,在第4天得出结果。总体而言,MSRV方案最佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验