• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急救人员使用自动体外除颤器进行院外除颤的效果。苏格兰心脏启动项目。

Efficacy of out of hospital defibrillation by ambulance technicians using automated external defibrillators. The Heartstart Scotland Project.

作者信息

Sedgwick M L, Watson J, Dalziel K, Carrington D J, Cobbe S M

机构信息

Department of Medical Cardiology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 1992 Aug-Sep;24(1):73-87. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(92)90175-c.

DOI:10.1016/0300-9572(92)90175-c
PMID:1332165
Abstract

During the Heartstart Scotland project all 407 ambulances in Scotland were equipped with automated external defibrillators (AEDs). All cases of chest pain or collapse aged over 10 years were monitored and multiple 3-s rhythm strips recorded in a solid state memory module. A shockable rhythm was defined as an organised rhythm of > or = 180 beats/min or a disorganised rhythm of > or = 100 beats/min and amplitude > 0.1 mV. We analysed all the stored rhythm strips in two patient populations to determine the ability of the AED and ambulance crews to detect a shockable rhythm and to initiate appropriate defibrillation. The first population comprised 493 patients, all of whom had received shocks. A total of 4741 rhythm strips were analysed, of which 1461 were true positives, 33 false positives, 3161 true negatives and 86 false negatives. Overall sensitivity of the AED was 94.4% and specificity 99.0%. The second population comprised a random sample of 200 shocked and 200 non-shocked arrests. The combined group contained 4154 rhythm strips of which 562 were true positives, 12 false positives, 3460 true negatives and 120 false negatives. Overall sensitivity of the system (AED+crew) was 82.4% and specificity 99.7%. However, only 66 of the 120 false negatives were attributable to the AED giving a sensitivity of 90.3% for the AED. The sensitivity of the AED is dependent on the prevalence of shockable rhythms, but will be within the range 90.3-94.4% for most emergency medical services. We conclude that early management of potentially lethal arrhythmias by ambulance technicians using AEDs is practical with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.

摘要

在“苏格兰心脏复苏启动”项目中,苏格兰所有407辆救护车都配备了自动体外除颤器(AED)。对所有10岁以上胸痛或晕倒病例进行监测,并在固态存储模块中记录多条3秒的心律条图。可电击心律定义为有组织的心律≥180次/分钟或无组织的心律≥100次/分钟且振幅>0.1 mV。我们分析了两组患者群体中所有存储的心律条图,以确定AED和救护人员检测可电击心律并进行适当除颤的能力。第一组包括493名患者,他们都接受了电击。共分析了4741条心律条图,其中1461条为真阳性,33条为假阳性,3161条为真阴性,86条为假阴性。AED的总体灵敏度为94.4%,特异性为99.0%。第二组包括200例电击后骤停和200例非电击后骤停的随机样本。合并组包含4154条心律条图,其中562条为真阳性,12条为假阳性,3460条为真阴性,120条为假阴性。系统(AED+救护人员)的总体灵敏度为82.4%,特异性为99.7%。然而,120例假阴性中只有66例归因于AED,AED的灵敏度为90.3%。AED的灵敏度取决于可电击心律的患病率,但对于大多数紧急医疗服务而言,将在90.3%-94.4%的范围内。我们得出结论,救护技术人员使用AED对潜在致命性心律失常进行早期管理是可行的,灵敏度和特异性均可接受。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of out of hospital defibrillation by ambulance technicians using automated external defibrillators. The Heartstart Scotland Project.急救人员使用自动体外除颤器进行院外除颤的效果。苏格兰心脏启动项目。
Resuscitation. 1992 Aug-Sep;24(1):73-87. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(92)90175-c.
2
Performance and error analysis of automated external defibrillator use in the out-of-hospital setting.院外环境中自动体外除颤器使用的性能与误差分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;38(3):262-7. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.117953.
3
"Heartstart Scotland"--initial experience of a national scheme for out of hospital defibrillation.“苏格兰心脏复苏计划”——院外除颤全国计划的初步经验。
BMJ. 1991 Jun 22;302(6791):1517-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6791.1517.
4
Performance of an established system of first responder out-of-hospital defibrillation. The results of the second year of the Heartstart Scotland Project in the 'Utstein Style'.既定的院外心脏除颤急救响应系统的运行情况。“乌斯坦模式”下苏格兰心脏启动项目第二年的结果。
Resuscitation. 1993 Aug;26(1):75-88. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(93)90166-n.
5
The Girona Territori Cardioprotegit Project: Performance Evaluation of Public Defibrillators.赫罗纳地区心脏保护项目:公共除颤器的性能评估
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;71(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 16.
6
The causative rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests witnessed by the emergency medical services in the Heartstart Scotland Project.
Resuscitation. 1994 Jan;27(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90022-1.
7
Italian experience with automated external defibrillators (AED).意大利使用自动体外除颤器(AED)的经验。
G Ital Cardiol. 1997 Nov;27(11):1121-4.
8
Sensitivity and specificity of two different automated external defibrillators.两种不同自动体外除颤器的灵敏度和特异性。
Resuscitation. 2017 Nov;120:108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Sensitivity and specificity of an automated external defibrillator algorithm designed for pediatric patients.一种专为儿科患者设计的自动体外除颤器算法的敏感性和特异性。
Resuscitation. 2008 Feb;76(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.06.032. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
10
Automated external defibrillator (AED) utilization rates and reasons fire and police first responders did not apply AEDs.自动体外除颤器(AED)的使用率以及消防和警察急救人员未使用AED的原因。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):378-82. doi: 10.1080/10903120290937969.

引用本文的文献

1
Detection of spontaneous pulse using the acceleration signals acquired from CPR feedback sensor in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.在猪心脏骤停模型中,利用从心肺复苏反馈传感器获取的加速度信号检测自发脉搏。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189217. eCollection 2017.
2
The automatic external cardioverter-defibrillator.自动体外心脏除颤器。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2004 Jul 1;4(3):114-21.
3
Cost-effectiveness of in-home automated external defibrillators for individuals at increased risk of sudden cardiac death.
家庭用自动体外除颤器对心脏性猝死风险增加个体的成本效益分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Mar;20(3):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40247.x.
4
Effect of reducing ambulance response times on deaths from out of hospital cardiac arrest: cohort study.缩短救护车响应时间对院外心脏骤停死亡的影响:队列研究
BMJ. 2001 Jun 9;322(7299):1385-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1385.
5
Out of hospital cardiac arrest and associated injury.院外心脏骤停及相关损伤。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 May;15(3):191-2. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.3.191.
6
Can the full range of paramedic skills improve survival from out of hospital cardiac arrests?全方位的护理技能能否提高院外心脏骤停的存活率?
J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Sep;14(5):274-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.5.274.
7
Effectiveness of ambulance paramedics versus ambulance technicians in managing out of hospital cardiac arrest.救护车护理人员与救护技术员在院外心脏骤停处理中的有效性比较
J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 May;14(3):142-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.3.142.
8
Prehospital emergency care.院前急救护理
BMJ. 1996 Nov 16;313(7067):1220-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7067.1220.
9
Survival of 1476 patients initially resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest.1476例最初从院外心脏骤停中复苏成功患者的生存情况。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 29;312(7047):1633-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1633.
10
Paramedics and technicians are equally successful at managing cardiac arrest outside hospital.护理人员和技术人员在院外心脏骤停的处理方面同样成功。
BMJ. 1995 Apr 29;310(6987):1091-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1091.