İflazoğlu Nidal, Üreyen Orhan, Öner Osman Zekai, Meral Ulvi Mehmet, Yülüklü Murat
Department of General Surgery, Kilis State Hospital, Kilis, Turkey.
Department of General Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Turk J Surg. 2018 Jan 4;34(1):38-42. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3795. eCollection 2018.
In line with advances in diagnostic methods and expectation of a decrease in the number of negative laparotomies, selective non-operative management of abdominal gunshot wounds has been increasingly used over the last three decades. We aim to detect the possibility of treatment without surgery and present our experience in selected cases referred from Syria to a hospital at the Turkish-Syrian border.
Between February 2012 and June 2014, patients admitted with abdominal gunshot wounds were analyzed. Computed tomography was performed for all patients on admission. Patients who were hemodynamically stable and did not have symptoms of peritonitis at the time of presentation were included in the study. The primary outcome parameters were mortality and morbidity. Successful selective non-operative management (Group 1) and unsuccessful selective non-operative management (Group 2) groups were compared in terms of complications, blood transfusion, injury site, injury severity score (ISS), and hospital stay.
Of 158 truncal injury patients, 18 were considered feasible for selective non-operative management. Of these, 14 (78%) patients were treated without surgery. Other Four patients were operated upon progressively increasing abdominal pain and tenderness during follow-up. On diagnostic exploration, all of these cases had intestinal perforations. No mortality was observed in selective non-operative management. There was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2, in terms of length of hospital stay (96 and 127 h, respectively). Also, there was no difference between groups in terms of blood transfusion necessity, injury site, complication rate, and injury severity score (p>0.05).
Decision making on patient selection for selective non-operative management is critical to ensure favorable outcomes. It is not possible to predict the success of selective non-operative management in advance. Cautious clinical examination and close monitoring of these patients is vital; however, emergency laparotomy should be performed in case of change in vital signs and positive symptoms concerning peritonitis.
随着诊断方法的进步以及对减少阴性剖腹手术数量的期望,在过去三十年中,腹部枪伤的选择性非手术治疗越来越多地被采用。我们旨在探讨非手术治疗的可能性,并介绍我们在从叙利亚转诊至土耳其 - 叙利亚边境一家医院的特定病例中的经验。
对2012年2月至2014年6月期间收治的腹部枪伤患者进行分析。所有患者入院时均进行了计算机断层扫描。纳入研究的患者为血流动力学稳定且就诊时无腹膜炎症状者。主要结局参数为死亡率和发病率。比较了成功的选择性非手术治疗组(第1组)和不成功的选择性非手术治疗组(第2组)在并发症、输血、损伤部位、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和住院时间方面的情况。
在158例躯干损伤患者中,18例被认为适合选择性非手术治疗。其中,14例(78%)患者接受了非手术治疗。另外4例患者在随访期间因腹痛和压痛逐渐加重而接受了手术。在诊断性探查中,所有这些病例均有肠穿孔。选择性非手术治疗中未观察到死亡病例。第1组和第2组在住院时间方面(分别为96小时和127小时)无统计学显著差异。此外,两组在输血必要性、损伤部位、并发症发生率和损伤严重程度评分方面也无差异(p>0.05)。
对于选择性非手术治疗的患者选择决策对于确保良好结局至关重要。无法预先预测选择性非手术治疗的成功与否。对这些患者进行谨慎的临床检查和密切监测至关重要;然而,一旦生命体征改变或出现与腹膜炎相关的阳性症状,应进行急诊剖腹手术。