Stronks K, van de Mheen H D, Looman C W, Mackenbach J P
Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Prev Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;26(5 Pt 1):754-66. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0174.
The aim was to identify the correlates of educational differences in smoking among adults.
We used data from the baseline of a Dutch longitudinal study, relating to a population of 2,462 respondents, ages 25-74. Logistic regression was used to assess the educational gradient in smoking. Current smokers were compared with former and never smokers, respectively.
The risk of being a current smoker compared with being a former/never smoker was higher among lower educational groups. For example, the odds of being a current smoker compared with never smoker among persons in the lowest level was more than five times as high as that for persons in the highest level. A substantial part (20-40%) of the increased risk of being a smoker among lower groups appeared to be associated with adverse material conditions. The financial situation especially accounted for that effect. One of the cultural factors, i.e., locus of control, was found to account for approximately 30% of the educational gradient in the case in which smokers were compared with former smokers. Psychosocial factors, i.e., neuroticism and coping styles, accounted for less of the gradient in smoking than cultural and material factors.
On the basis of the results, we hypothesize that both cultural and material factors contribute to the higher smoking rates among lower socioeconomic groups. Psychosocial factors seem to be less important. If our results are confirmed in more powerful studies, this would indicate, first, that possibilities for a reduction of smoking differences may be found in tailoring smoking cessation programs to the more externally oriented locus of control and the coping styles that are common among lower educational groups, and second, that a reduction of smoking differences may follow from an improvement of the material living conditions of lower socioeconomic groups.
目的是确定成年人吸烟教育差异的相关因素。
我们使用了一项荷兰纵向研究基线的数据,涉及2462名年龄在25 - 74岁之间的受访者。采用逻辑回归评估吸烟的教育梯度。分别将当前吸烟者与曾经吸烟者和从不吸烟者进行比较。
与曾经/从不吸烟者相比,低教育组成为当前吸烟者的风险更高。例如,最低教育水平人群中当前吸烟者与从不吸烟者相比的几率是最高教育水平人群的五倍多。低教育组成为吸烟者风险增加的很大一部分(20 - 40%)似乎与不利的物质条件有关。财务状况尤其造成了这种影响。文化因素之一,即控制点,在将吸烟者与曾经吸烟者比较的情况下,约占教育梯度的30%。心理社会因素,即神经质和应对方式,在吸烟梯度中所占比例低于文化和物质因素。
根据研究结果,我们假设文化和物质因素都导致了社会经济地位较低群体中较高的吸烟率。心理社会因素似乎不太重要。如果我们的结果在更有力的研究中得到证实,这将表明,首先,在为更外向型控制点和低教育组常见的应对方式量身定制戒烟计划时,可能会找到减少吸烟差异的方法;其次,社会经济地位较低群体物质生活条件的改善可能会导致吸烟差异的减少。