• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过计算机动态远红外热像仪(CDTT)测量变应原诱导的皮肤反应。

Measurement of allergen-induced skin reactions by computerized dynamic telethermography (CDTT).

作者信息

Bagnato G F, Gulli S, Denuzzo G, Di Cesare E, Sansotta C, D'Ambrosio F P, Vermiglio G

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Italy.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 1997 Jul-Aug;7(4):238-41.

PMID:9330188
Abstract

Cutaneous thermic changes induced by a skin prick test reaction were measured by an infrared thermography camera (computerized dynamic telethermography, CDTT). Changes in skin temperature (T degree) detected by CDTT were compared with the mean diameter of allergen-induced skin reactions. Cutaneous thermic increase detected by CDTT correlated well with the mean wheal diameter measured in millimeters (r = 0.938, p < 0.001). Average coefficient of variation for repeated CDTT measurements was 4.6%. CDTT provides a reproducible and precise method for measuring allergen-induced skin reactions. Moreover, the continuous recording of the skin temperature represents an additional parameter for the quantification of wheal reactions.

摘要

通过红外热成像相机(计算机化动态远距热成像,CDTT)测量皮肤点刺试验反应引起的皮肤温度变化。将CDTT检测到的皮肤温度(T度)变化与变应原诱导的皮肤反应的平均直径进行比较。CDTT检测到的皮肤温度升高与以毫米为单位测量的平均风团直径密切相关(r = 0.938,p < 0.001)。重复进行CDTT测量的平均变异系数为4.6%。CDTT为测量变应原诱导的皮肤反应提供了一种可重复且精确的方法。此外,皮肤温度的连续记录是定量风团反应的一个额外参数。

相似文献

1
Measurement of allergen-induced skin reactions by computerized dynamic telethermography (CDTT).通过计算机动态远红外热像仪(CDTT)测量变应原诱导的皮肤反应。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 1997 Jul-Aug;7(4):238-41.
2
Application of thermography for the assessment of allergen-induced skin reactions.热成像技术在评估过敏原引起的皮肤反应中的应用。
Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):765-72. doi: 10.1118/1.3533940.
3
Critical evaluation of the use of skin tests and cellular tests in standardization of allergens.变应原标准化中皮肤试验和细胞试验应用的批判性评估。
Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M. 1994(87):89-114; discussion 114-7.
4
[Use of thermographic methods for estimation of skin prick test results. II. Evaluation of skin prick test results with histamine solutions of different concentration using liquid crystal mixtures].[使用热成像方法评估皮肤点刺试验结果。II. 使用不同浓度组胺溶液的液晶混合物评估皮肤点刺试验结果]
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 1996;64(3-4):123-31.
5
Phazet skin prick tests versus conventional prick tests with allergens and histamine in children.儿童中使用Phazet皮肤点刺试验与传统过敏原和组胺点刺试验的比较。
Ann Allergy. 1990 Feb;64(2 Pt 1):166-9.
6
[Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].[草花粉过敏患者组胺等效皮肤试验中的皮肤反应性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2000 May-Jun;128(5-6):194-9.
7
The longest wheal diameter is the optimal measurement for the evaluation of skin prick tests.最长风团直径是评估皮肤点刺试验的最佳测量指标。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010;151(4):343-5. doi: 10.1159/000250443. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
8
Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.皮试部位之间的距离及身体区域对皮肤点刺试验结果的影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Feb;97(2):596-601. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70304-4.
9
[Specific skin reactions induced by individual pollen preparations in hypersensitivity persons].[过敏体质者中个体花粉制剂诱发的特异性皮肤反应]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 Sep-Oct;126(9-10):362-7.
10
[Use of thermography methods for evaluating skin prick tests. I. Background temperature of area where skin prick tests are performed. Optimal color scale of temperature differences registered by liquid crystals and conditions of their use].[使用热成像方法评估皮肤点刺试验。I. 进行皮肤点刺试验区域的背景温度。液晶记录的温度差异的最佳色标及其使用条件]
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 1995;63(9-10):507-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Thermographic assessment of skin prick tests in comparison with the routine evaluation methods.皮肤点刺试验的热成像评估与常规评估方法的比较
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016 Jun;33(3):193-8. doi: 10.5114/ada.2016.60611. Epub 2016 Jun 17.