Ferguson K S, Dacey C M
Department of Psychology, Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 1997 Oct;21(10):941-52. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(97)00055-0.
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between childhood psychological maltreatment and adult manifestations of depression, anxiety, and dissociation.
Women health care professionals reporting a history of childhood psychological maltreatment (n = 55) were compared to a nonabused control group (n = 55) on the three dimensions of anxiety, depression, and dissociation. The Childhood Experiences Questionnaire, a measure constructed specifically for this study to assess abuse history, was used to determine group membership. Participants were administered the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES).
A significant discriminant function analysis using the STAI, BDI, and DES as predictor variables was able to correctly classify 74.5% of the psychologically abused participants and 89.1% of the nonabused group, with an overall hit rate of 81.8%. Statistically significant differences were obtained between the abused and nonabused groups on the STAI, BDI, and DES.
Interpretation of these results suggests that participants who reported a history of childhood psychological abuse suffer significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety, and more frequent dissociative experiences, than the nonabused women.
本研究旨在探讨童年期心理虐待与成人抑郁、焦虑及解离表现之间的关系。
将报告有童年期心理虐待史的女性医疗保健专业人员(n = 55)与未受虐待的对照组(n = 55)在焦虑、抑郁和解离三个维度上进行比较。使用专门为本研究构建的用于评估虐待史的儿童经历问卷来确定分组。对参与者进行状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和解离体验量表(DES)的测试。
以STAI、BDI和DES作为预测变量进行的显著判别函数分析能够正确分类74.5%的受心理虐待参与者和89.1%的未受虐待组参与者,总体命中率为81.8%。在STAI、BDI和DES上,受虐待组和未受虐待组之间存在统计学上的显著差异。
这些结果的解释表明,报告有童年期心理虐待史的参与者比未受虐待的女性遭受更高水平的抑郁和焦虑,以及更频繁的解离体验。