Davis P, Russell A S, Skeith K J
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
J Rheumatol. 1997 Oct;24(10):1995-9.
To determine the feasibility of using standardized patients in the performance of a needs assessment and subsequent development of a continuing medical education (CME) intervention in rheumatology for family physicians.
Eight family physicians and 7 rheumatologists undertook 36 encounters with standardized patients simulating 3 common rheumatologic complaints. Encounters were assessed according to a predetermined score addressing issues of communication skills, clinical diagnosis, investigations, and management. Data obtained were used to develop a small group problem based learning event.
Mean scores differed considerably between rheumatologists and family physicians (7.2 vs 3.6; possible range -3 to +9), between individuals within the 2 groups (rheumatologists 2.5 to +9; family physicians -1 to 6.5), and between cases. Specific areas of individual and group need for the development of a subsequent CME intervention were identified and included communication skills, clinical skills in the development of a differential diagnosis, appropriate use and interpretation of investigations, and appropriate management.
Standardized patients can be effectively used to undertake a needs assessment in rheumatology. Specific data can be used to develop a small group problem based learning program with objectives meeting the identified needs and using the same standardized patients.
确定在对家庭医生进行需求评估以及随后开展风湿病继续医学教育(CME)干预时使用标准化病人的可行性。
8名家庭医生和7名风湿病学家与模拟3种常见风湿病主诉的标准化病人进行了36次会诊。根据预先确定的评分标准对会诊进行评估,该标准涉及沟通技巧、临床诊断、检查和管理等问题。所获得的数据被用于开展一个基于小组问题的学习活动。
风湿病学家和家庭医生之间的平均得分差异很大(7.2对3.6;可能范围为-3至+9),两组内个体之间(风湿病学家为2.5至+9;家庭医生为-1至6.5)以及病例之间也存在差异。确定了后续CME干预发展中个人和群体需要改进的具体领域,包括沟通技巧、鉴别诊断中的临床技能、检查的合理使用和解读以及合理管理。
标准化病人可有效地用于进行风湿病需求评估。具体数据可用于开发一个基于小组问题的学习项目,其目标满足已确定的需求,并使用相同的标准化病人。