Vernon S W, Myers R E, Tilley B C
School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston 77030, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Oct;6(10):825-32.
This report describes the development and refinement of a set of scales for use in research on predictors of colorectal cancer screening adherence. The study population included 2693 of 4490 eligible white male automotive employees who answered a mailed questionnaire (60% response rate) on beliefs and attitudes related to colorectal cancer and screening. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and multitrait scaling analysis were used to evaluate the construct validity of a priori scales developed to measure salience and coherence, perceived susceptibility, worries about screening, screening efficacy, social influence, and intention. Analyses supported the construct validity of scales for salience and coherence, perceived susceptibility, and worries about screening. Four items originally assigned to the salience and coherence construct loaded on a separate factor that appeared to measure self-efficacy. There was no empirical support for scales measuring screening efficacy and social influence, and there was limited empirical support for a scale measuring intention. Confirmatory factor analysis of the scales measuring salience and coherence, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility, and worries about screening showed a similar factor structure in white men with and without a personal history of polyps, indicating that the scales may be useful for studies of both colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Multitrait scaling analysis showed some support for internal consistency reliability of those scales in women (n = 42) and in African-American men (n = 56), and there was some support for the factor structure in those two subgroups. Future studies should evaluate the psychometric properties of these and similar scales in diverse population subgroups.
本报告描述了一套用于结直肠癌筛查依从性预测因素研究的量表的开发与完善。研究人群包括4490名符合条件的白人男性汽车行业员工中的2693人,他们回复了一份关于结直肠癌及筛查相关信念和态度的邮寄问卷(回复率为60%)。探索性和验证性因素分析以及多特质量表分析被用于评估为测量显著性与连贯性、感知易感性、对筛查的担忧、筛查效能、社会影响和意愿而预先制定的量表的结构效度。分析支持了显著性与连贯性、感知易感性以及对筛查的担忧等量表的结构效度。最初分配给显著性与连贯性结构的四个项目加载到一个单独的因素上,该因素似乎测量的是自我效能感。对于测量筛查效能和社会影响的量表没有实证支持,对于测量意愿的量表只有有限的实证支持。对测量显著性与连贯性、自我效能感、感知易感性以及对筛查的担忧的量表进行验证性因素分析表明,有息肉个人史和无息肉个人史的白人男性具有相似的因素结构,这表明这些量表可能对结直肠癌筛查和监测研究都有用。多特质量表分析显示,在女性(n = 42)和非裔美国男性(n = 56)中,对这些量表的内部一致性信度有一定支持,并且对这两个亚组的因素结构也有一定支持。未来的研究应评估这些量表以及类似量表在不同人群亚组中的心理测量特性。