• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of four-factor colorectal cancer screening belief scale.中文版四因素结直肠癌筛查信念量表的心理测量学特性
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 May 15;9(9):100081. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100081. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for colorectal cancer screening.用于结直肠癌筛查的波斯语版冠军健康信念模型量表的心理测量学特性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4595-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.11.4595.
3
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of Revised Colorectal Cancer Perception and Screening Instrument among First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China.中国结直肠癌患者一级亲属中修订版结直肠癌认知与筛查工具的翻译、改编及验证
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Mar 30;7(2):180-189. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_6_20. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
4
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
5
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales.中文肺癌筛查健康信念量表的汉化及信效度检验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the postpartum depression literacy scale.产后抑郁知识量表中文版的跨文化适应及心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:966770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966770. eCollection 2022.
7
Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Colorectal Cancer Perceptions Scale in a sample of older Chinese people.中文版结直肠癌认知量表在老年中国人样本中的心理测量学特性
Cancer Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;37(5):E53-60. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000107.
8
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the health behavior motivation scale: a translation and validation study.健康行为动机量表中文版的心理测量学特性:一项翻译与验证研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 17;15:1279816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279816. eCollection 2024.
9
Adapting Champion's Breast Cancer Fear Scale to colorectal cancer: psychometric testing in a sample of older Chinese adults.将冠军乳腺癌恐惧量表应用于结直肠癌:在中国老年成年人样本中的心理测量测试。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Jun;18(3):281-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.

引用本文的文献

1
Colonoscopy Uptake in First-Degree Relatives of CRC Patients: Challenges and Intervention Strategies.结直肠癌患者一级亲属的结肠镜检查接受情况:挑战与干预策略
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Mar 29;19:855-868. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S501332. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional Barriers to Bowel Screening in Italy: Scale psychometric properties and effects on screening attendance.意大利人进行肠道筛查的情绪障碍:量表心理测量学特性及其对筛查参与率的影响。
Psychooncology. 2022 Jan;31(1):78-85. doi: 10.1002/pon.5781. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Screeners vs. Non-screeners for Colorectal Cancer among People over 50 Years of Age: Factual and Psychological Discriminants.50 岁以上人群结直肠癌的筛查者与非筛查者:事实和心理鉴别因素。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2020 Oct 27;29(4):529-537. doi: 10.15403/jgld-2263.
4
The health belief model and colorectal cancer screening in the general population: A systematic review.健康信念模型与普通人群的结直肠癌筛查:一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Oct 6;20:101223. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101223. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of Revised Colorectal Cancer Perception and Screening Instrument among First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China.中国结直肠癌患者一级亲属中修订版结直肠癌认知与筛查工具的翻译、改编及验证
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Mar 30;7(2):180-189. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_6_20. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
6
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.2020 年结直肠癌统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145-164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies.全球结直肠癌负担:趋势、风险因素和预防策略。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;16(12):713-732. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Financial Incentives to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake and Decrease Disparities: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励措施对提高结直肠癌筛查参与度和减少差异的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196570. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6570.
9
Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.美国癌症协会 2018 年普通风险成年人结直肠癌筛查指南更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Testing the Difference Between Reliability Coefficients Alpha and Omega.检验信度系数α和ω之间的差异。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Apr;77(2):185-203. doi: 10.1177/0013164416658325. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

中文版四因素结直肠癌筛查信念量表的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of four-factor colorectal cancer screening belief scale.

作者信息

Yang Liu, Zhao Rui, Li Shan, Ji Chaona, Qin Jiexiong, Song Yalan, Wu Xiaodan

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Nursing, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 May 15;9(9):100081. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100081. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100081
PMID:36060833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9428841/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Screening improves the early diagnosis rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) and effectively reduces its mortality. The four-factor CRC screening belief scale is conducive to understanding the psychometric properties of screening beliefs, but no Chinese version of this scale is available. The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the four-factor ​CRC ​screening belief scale in ​patients ​with cancer and their relatives.

METHODS

The four-factor CRC screening belief scale was translated into Chinese based on Brislin's model. A panel review ensured the cultural adaptation and content validity of the scale. The scale was then administered to a convenience sample of 425 Chinese people recruited from July 2019 to June 2021.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis identified the factor structure for the Chinese version of the four-factor CRC screening belief scale, including perceived barriers, perceived benefits, self-efficacy, and optimism. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fits well. The scale-level content validity index was 1.0. The correlation between the Chinese version of the four-factor CRC screening belief scale and the CRC health belief model scale was statistically significant ( = 0.831, < 0.01). McDonald's omega coefficients for the entire scale were 0.939 and 0.774-0.948 for the four subscales. The translated scale had test-retest reliability of 0.719 and split-half reliability of 0.646.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the four-factor CRC screening belief scale showed adequate reliability and validity. The translation and validation of psychosocial assessment tools for CRC screening across languages, cultures, and countries will contribute to further international research collaborations and the improvement of the prospects for the prevention and care of CRC.

摘要

目的

筛查可提高结直肠癌(CRC)的早期诊断率并有效降低其死亡率。四因素CRC筛查信念量表有助于了解筛查信念的心理测量特性,但尚无该量表的中文版。本研究旨在测试中文版四因素CRC筛查信念量表在癌症患者及其亲属中的心理测量特性。

方法

基于布里斯林模型将四因素CRC筛查信念量表翻译成中文。专家小组审查确保了该量表的文化适应性和内容效度。然后将该量表施用于2019年7月至2021年6月招募的425名中国人的便利样本。

结果

探索性因素分析确定了中文版四因素CRC筛查信念量表的因素结构,包括感知障碍、感知益处、自我效能和乐观主义。验证性因素分析表明模型拟合良好。量表水平的内容效度指数为1.0。中文版四因素CRC筛查信念量表与CRC健康信念模型量表之间的相关性具有统计学意义(= 0.831,<0.01)。整个量表的麦克唐纳ω系数为0.939,四个子量表的系数为0.774 - 0.948。翻译后的量表重测信度为0.719,分半信度为0.646。

结论

中文版四因素CRC筛查信念量表显示出足够的信度和效度。跨语言、文化和国家对CRC筛查的社会心理评估工具进行翻译和验证,将有助于进一步开展国际研究合作,并改善CRC预防和护理的前景。