Arrow P
Dental Services, Health Department of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):278-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00940.x.
Caries of the pits and fissures of permanent teeth continues to be a problem for children, newly erupted permanent molars being particularly at risk. Oral hygiene measures have been shown to be able to reduce the incidence of caries. The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effects on newly erupted first permanent molars of a professional tooth cleaning and oral health education program (test) with a standard preventive program (control), comprising selective fissure sealing and application of topical fluorides. School Dental Service clinics of the Health Department of Western Australia, in Perth, were assigned to four test or four control clinics. Schoolchildren, mean age 6.3 +/- 0.3 (s) years with sound, newly erupted first permanent molars were included in the study (207 test, 197 control). After 12 months, 186 test and 163 control children were examined by an examiner who was 'blind' to the test or control status of the children. Caries of the first permanent molars developed in 34 test and 35 control children; the estimated risk ratio was 0.86 (95% CI 0.56, 1.30). Children in the test group had an average DFT score of 0.26 +/- 0.62 compared with 0.29 +/- 0.64 DFT in the control group (t-test, P = 0.67). The 12-month results suggest that there was no statistically significant difference between the caries-preventive effects of a professional tooth cleaning and oral health education program and a program based on selective fissure sealing and application of topical fluorides.
恒牙窝沟龋仍然是儿童面临的一个问题,新萌出的恒磨牙尤其容易患龋。口腔卫生措施已被证明能够降低龋齿的发病率。本研究的目的是比较专业牙齿清洁和口腔健康教育项目(试验组)与标准预防项目(对照组,包括选择性窝沟封闭和局部用氟)对新萌出的第一恒磨牙的防龋效果。西澳大利亚州卫生部位于珀斯的学校牙科服务诊所被分为四个试验组诊所或四个对照组诊所。研究纳入了平均年龄为6.3±0.3(标准差)岁、第一恒磨牙健康且新萌出的学童(试验组207名,对照组197名)。12个月后,由一名对儿童的试验组或对照组状态“不知情”的检查者对186名试验组儿童和163名对照组儿童进行检查。试验组34名儿童和对照组35名儿童的第一恒磨牙发生了龋坏;估计风险比为0.86(95%可信区间0.56, 1.30)。试验组儿童的平均龋失补牙面数(DFT)评分为0.26±0.62,而对照组为0.29±0.64(t检验,P = 0.67)。12个月的结果表明,专业牙齿清洁和口腔健康教育项目与基于选择性窝沟封闭和局部用氟的项目在防龋效果上没有统计学上的显著差异。