Herman S P
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;36(10 Suppl):57S-68S. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199710001-00005.
These practice parameters are presented as a guide for clinicians evaluating the often delicate and complex issues surrounding a child custody dispute. The historical basis of child custody and the various judicial presumptions that have guided courts are reviewed. The differences between performing child custody evaluation and engaging in traditional clinical practice are emphasized. Issues that are common to all child custody disputes are presented, including continuity and quality of attachments, preference, parental alienation, special needs of children, education, gender issues, sibling relationships, parents' physical and mental health, parents' work schedules, parents' finances, styles of parenting and discipline, conflict resolution, social support systems, cultural and ethnic issues, ethics and values, and religion. In addition, special issues that complicate custody evaluations are discussed, including infants in custody disputes, homosexual parents, grandparents' rights, parental kidnaping, relocation problems, allegations of sexual abuse, and advances in reproductive technology, such as frozen embryos, oocyte donation, and artificial insemination. An outline is provided that describes the complete evaluation process, from assessing referrals and planning a strategy through conducting clinical interviews, writing the report, and testifying in court.
这些实践参数旨在为临床医生评估围绕儿童监护权纠纷的通常微妙而复杂的问题提供指导。回顾了儿童监护权的历史基础以及指导法院的各种司法推定。强调了进行儿童监护权评估与从事传统临床实践之间的差异。介绍了所有儿童监护权纠纷中常见的问题,包括依恋关系的连续性和质量、偏好、父母离间、儿童的特殊需求、教育、性别问题、兄弟姐妹关系、父母的身心健康、父母的工作时间表、父母的财务状况、养育和管教方式、冲突解决、社会支持系统、文化和种族问题、伦理和价值观以及宗教。此外,还讨论了使监护权评估复杂化的特殊问题,包括监护权纠纷中的婴儿、同性恋父母、祖父母的权利、父母绑架、搬迁问题、性虐待指控以及生殖技术的进展,如冷冻胚胎、卵子捐赠和人工授精。提供了一个大纲,描述了完整的评估过程,从评估转介和制定策略到进行临床访谈、撰写报告以及在法庭上作证。