• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Specialties and the specialty boards.

作者信息

Holden W D

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 1976 Jun;86(6):763-8. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197606000-00003.

DOI:10.1288/00005537-197606000-00003
PMID:933668
Abstract

As specialism has developed in the United States, multiple specialty societies and specialty boards have been created. Although they, in a very realistic fashion, have established the general standards for the delivery of specialty care and for graduate medical education, they, with other national medical organizations such as the American Medical Association, the Association of American Medical Colleges, and the American Hospital Association, function with a considerable degree of independence. There is lacking a cohesive and integrated effort to develop unified attitudes, postures, and policies that represent the medical profession and the health care industry in general. Recently the Coordinating Council on Medical Education and the Liaison Committee on Graduate Medical Education have been established. These two agencies represent a significant attempt to integrate policies for medical education and to identify a single accrediting agency that will apply uniform standards to the process of accrediting programs of graduate medical education. The federal government for the past several years has had an increasing interest in the health care industry and medical education. Many legislative bills have been passed which have imposed more and more regulations on medicine and have established more bureaucratic control over the professional activities of physicians. Insidiously the medical profession is being socialized. If accountability for the public welfare cannot be exercised by medicine, at least in the perspective of the federal government, more and more legislation and regulation are inevitable. The pluralistic structure of organized medicine will ultimately be self defeating. Cohesive policies on behalf of the medical profession must be developed if leadership in medicine is to remain in the private sector. The Coordinating Council on Medical Education is unquestionably a significant attempt to demonstrate public accountability. It is, however, only the first step in the long and difficult process of developing cohesive national policies on behalf of organized medicine.

摘要

相似文献

1
Specialties and the specialty boards.
Laryngoscope. 1976 Jun;86(6):763-8. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197606000-00003.
2
Medical doctors profile in Ethiopia: production, attrition and retention. In memory of 100-years Ethiopian modern medicine & the new Ethiopian millennium.埃塞俄比亚医生概况:培养、流失与留存。纪念埃塞俄比亚现代医学百年及新千年。
Ethiop Med J. 2008 Jan;46 Suppl 1:1-77.
3
[Graduate education in surgery in Japan].[日本的外科研究生教育]
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2009 May;110(3):115-9.
4
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
5
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
6
Special Report. Council of Medical Specialty Societies: CMSS--a national medical federation.特别报道。医学专业协会理事会:CMSS——一个全国性的医学联合会。
N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 26;307(9):570-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198208263070941.
7
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
8
Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments.实践指南:医学领域的新现实。一、近期进展。
Arch Intern Med. 1990 Sep;150(9):1811-8.
9
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
10
Quality, quantity and distribution of medical education and care: regulation by the private sector or mandate by government?医学教育与医疗服务的质量、数量及分布:由私营部门监管还是政府强制规定?
Ann Surg. 1975 May;181(5):760-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197505000-00035.