• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Change in drug-using networks of injecting drug users during methadone treatment: a pilot study using snowball recruitment and intensive interviews.

作者信息

Willems J C, Iguchi M Y, Lidz V, Bux D A

机构信息

University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 1997 Sep;32(11):1539-54. doi: 10.3109/10826089709055877.

DOI:10.3109/10826089709055877
PMID:9336864
Abstract

This pilot study used snowball recruitment methods and intensive interviews to assess personal drug-using networks and HIV risk behavior of injection drug users (IDUs). Index subjects were 22 methadone maintenance patients reporting current drug injection who were interviewed about personal drug-using networks both current and prior to treatment entry. The index subjects were then asked to recruit other network members to the study. Ninety-seven network members were identified and 40 interviewed, including 18 not in treatment. Index IDUs reported fewer co-IDUs for the treatment period than the pretreatment period, suggesting a reduction in risk of exposure to HIV. The combination of snowball recruitment and intensive interview procedures constitutes a useful method for studying IDU networks.

摘要

相似文献

1
Change in drug-using networks of injecting drug users during methadone treatment: a pilot study using snowball recruitment and intensive interviews.
Subst Use Misuse. 1997 Sep;32(11):1539-54. doi: 10.3109/10826089709055877.
2
Suspected determinants of enrollment into detoxification and methadone maintenance treatment among injecting drug users.注射吸毒者中戒毒及美沙酮维持治疗入组的可疑决定因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1994 Oct;36(2):129-38. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(94)90095-7.
3
Use of antiretroviral therapies by HIV-infected persons receiving methadone maintenance.接受美沙酮维持治疗的艾滋病毒感染者对抗逆转录病毒疗法的使用情况。
J Addict Dis. 2000;19(1):85-94. doi: 10.1300/J069v19n01_07.
4
Methadone treatment as a determinant of HIV risk reduction among injecting drug users: a nested case-control study.美沙酮治疗对注射吸毒者降低艾滋病病毒风险的影响:一项巢式病例对照研究。
AIDS Care. 1994;6(2):215-20. doi: 10.1080/09540129408258632.
5
Predictors of injecting and injecting risk-taking behaviour among methadone-maintenance clients.美沙酮维持治疗患者中注射及注射风险行为的预测因素
Addiction. 1994 Mar;89(3):311-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00897.x.
6
Correlates of willingness to initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis and anticipation of practicing safer drug- and sex-related behaviors among high-risk drug users on methadone treatment.美沙酮治疗的高危吸毒者中暴露前预防用药意愿及对实施更安全的毒品和性相关行为预期的相关因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Apr 1;173:107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Psychopathology and HIV risk behaviors among injection drug users in and out of treatment.接受治疗和未接受治疗的注射吸毒者的精神病理学与艾滋病毒风险行为
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996 Dec 2;43(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(96)01290-2.
8
[Do we need a methadone maintenance program?].我们需要美沙酮维持治疗项目吗?
Nervenarzt. 1991 Sep;62(9):524-8.
9
Methadone maintenance treatment and HIV risk-taking behaviour among injecting drug users in Berlin.柏林注射吸毒者中的美沙酮维持治疗与HIV冒险行为
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Oct;50(5):534-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.5.534.
10
The effect of methadone maintenance on positive outcomes for opiate injection drug users.美沙酮维持治疗对阿片类注射吸毒者积极转归的影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Sep;37(2):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.11.004. Epub 2009 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of opiate agonist maintenance therapy on drug use within social networks of injecting drug users.阿片类激动剂维持治疗对注射吸毒者社交网络内药物使用的影响。
Am J Addict. 2008 Sep-Oct;17(5):414-21. doi: 10.1080/10550490802268165.
2
Facilitating treatment entry among out-of-treatment injection drug users.促进戒毒注射吸毒者接受治疗。
Public Health Rep. 1998 Jun;113 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):116-28.