Capaldi D M, Chamberlain P, Fetrow R A, Wilson J E
Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene 97401, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 1997 Aug;25(4):471-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1024607605690.
Many prevention studies are now designed with complementary interventions in different settings. Evaluations of these interventions require assessing the child's behavior in each of these settings. Conducting these studies, therefore, may involve recruiting school districts, principals, classroom teachers, peers, parents, siblings, and in later years, employers and intimate partners. These participants may be considered natural raters or satellite subjects, depending on their degree of involvement. Issues of recruitment and retention thus are magnified in multimethod, multiagent studies. To illustrate these issues, findings are presented for three studies conducted with risk populations in the past decade at the Oregon Social Learning Center: a passive longitudinal study, a selected prevention study, and an indicated prevention study. Findings indicate that achieving high recruitment and retention rates for at-risk and high-risk subjects in multisetting studies is possible, and that a developmental approach should be taken to recruiting risk populations.
现在,许多预防研究都设计了在不同环境中的补充干预措施。对这些干预措施的评估需要在每个环境中评估儿童的行为。因此,开展这些研究可能涉及招募学区、校长、课堂教师、同龄人、家长、兄弟姐妹,以及在后期招募雇主和亲密伴侣。根据他们的参与程度,这些参与者可被视为自然评估者或附属受试者。因此,在多方法、多主体研究中,招募和保留参与者的问题被放大了。为了说明这些问题,本文介绍了俄勒冈社会学习中心在过去十年中对风险人群进行的三项研究的结果:一项被动纵向研究、一项选择性预防研究和一项指示性预防研究。结果表明,在多环境研究中,实现高危和极高危受试者的高招募率和保留率是可能的,并且应该采用发展性方法来招募风险人群。