• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普拉克索与溴隐亭治疗晚期帕金森病的双盲安慰剂对照研究。国际普拉克索 - 溴隐亭研究小组。

Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease. International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group.

作者信息

Guttman M

机构信息

Human Neurochemical Pathology Laboratory, Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Neurology. 1997 Oct;49(4):1060-5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.4.1060.

DOI:10.1212/wnl.49.4.1060
PMID:9339690
Abstract

Pramipexole is a new, selective, nonergoline dopamine agonist that acts on D2 and preferentially on D3 dopamine receptors. Phase II and III clinical trials have shown this drug to be useful in treating both early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study was performed to compare the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of pramipexole versus placebo in patients with advanced PD with motor fluctuations. A bromocriptine treatment group was included to enable comparisons between bromocriptine and placebo groups, but the study was not powered to show statistical differences between the active treatment groups. The study included 247 patients with "wearing off." Patients were Hoehn and Yahr stages II to IV during "on" times. The trial included three phases: dose escalation, 6 months' maintenance, and dose reduction. The primary end points were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts II and III. Up to 4.5 mg per day of pramipexole and 30 mg per day of bromocriptine were used. The results of the study showed that the UPDRS part II improved by 26.7% for pramipexole (p = 0.0002) and 14% for bromocriptine (p = 0.02) versus 4.8% for placebo. The UPDRS part III showed improvements of 34% for pramipexole (p = 0.0006) and 23.8% for bromocriptine (p = 0.01) versus 5.7% for placebo. There were no major differences in safety data. In the active treatment groups there were more reports of dyskinesia and nausea compared with placebo. In regard to comparison of the Global Clinical Assessment of Efficacy between active treatment groups, there was a trend to significance (p = 0.056) in favor of pramipexole. We conclude that pramipexole-treated patients with advanced PD improved significantly more than placebo for both primary end points.

摘要

普拉克索是一种新型、选择性、非麦角林类多巴胺激动剂,作用于D2受体,对D3多巴胺受体具有优先亲和力。II期和III期临床试验表明,该药物对早期和晚期帕金森病(PD)患者均有效。进行了一项双盲、随机、多中心研究,比较普拉克索与安慰剂在晚期PD伴运动波动患者中的安全性、耐受性和疗效。纳入了溴隐亭治疗组,以便在溴隐亭组和安慰剂组之间进行比较,但该研究的样本量不足以显示活性治疗组之间的统计学差异。该研究纳入了247例出现“疗效减退”的患者。患者在“开”期处于Hoehn和Yahr II至IV期。试验包括三个阶段:剂量递增、6个月维持期和剂量递减。主要终点为统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)的第二部分和第三部分。普拉克索每日最高用量为4.5 mg,溴隐亭每日最高用量为30 mg。研究结果显示,与安慰剂组改善4.8%相比,普拉克索组UPDRS第二部分改善了26.7%(p = 0.0002),溴隐亭组改善了14%(p = 0.02)。普拉克索组UPDRS第三部分改善了34%(p = 0.0006),溴隐亭组改善了23.8%(p = 0.01),而安慰剂组改善了5.7%。安全性数据方面无重大差异。与安慰剂组相比,活性治疗组出现异动症和恶心的报告更多。关于活性治疗组之间的整体临床疗效评估比较,有倾向于普拉克索的显著趋势(p = 0.056)。我们得出结论,对于两个主要终点,普拉克索治疗的晚期PD患者比安慰剂组有更显著的改善。

相似文献

1
Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease. International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group.普拉克索与溴隐亭治疗晚期帕金森病的双盲安慰剂对照研究。国际普拉克索 - 溴隐亭研究小组。
Neurology. 1997 Oct;49(4):1060-5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.4.1060.
2
Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of the non-ergoline dopamine agonist pramipexole in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study.非麦角类多巴胺激动剂普拉克索治疗晚期帕金森病的疗效、安全性及耐受性:一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、多中心研究。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;66(4):436-41. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.4.436.
3
Pramipexole versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease.普拉克索与溴隐亭治疗帕金森病左旋多巴诱导的并发症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(3):CD002259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002259.
4
Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial. Parkinson Study Group.普拉克索与左旋多巴作为帕金森病初始治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验。帕金森研究组
JAMA. 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1931-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.15.1931.
5
Safety and efficacy of pramipexole in early Parkinson disease. A randomized dose-ranging study. Parkinson Study Group.普拉克索在早期帕金森病中的安全性和有效性。一项随机剂量范围研究。帕金森研究小组。
JAMA. 1997 Jul 9;278(2):125-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550020057038.
6
Pramipexole. A review of its use in the management of early and advanced Parkinson's disease.普拉克索。关于其在早期和晚期帕金森病管理中应用的综述。
Drugs Aging. 1998 Jun;12(6):495-514. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199812060-00007.
7
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pramipexole in untreated and levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease.普拉克索在未经治疗及接受左旋多巴治疗的帕金森病患者中的疗效、安全性及耐受性
J Neurol Sci. 2003 Dec 15;216(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(03)00217-x.
8
Randomized, double-blind study of pramipexole with placebo and bromocriptine in advanced Parkinson's disease.普拉克索与安慰剂及溴隐亭治疗晚期帕金森病的随机双盲研究。
Mov Disord. 2003 Oct;18(10):1149-56. doi: 10.1002/mds.10508.
9
Long-term efficacy and safety of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson's disease: results from a European multicenter trial.普拉克索治疗晚期帕金森病的长期疗效与安全性:一项欧洲多中心试验的结果
Mov Disord. 2005 May;20(5):602-10. doi: 10.1002/mds.20397.
10
Pramipexole for the treatment of depressive symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.普拉克索治疗帕金森病患者抑郁症状的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jun;9(6):573-80. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70106-X. Epub 2010 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Ergot Dopamine Agonists and the Risk of Heart Failure and Other Adverse Cardiovascular Reactions in Parkinson's Disease.非麦角类多巴胺激动剂与帕金森病患者心力衰竭及其他不良心血管反应的风险
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 31;14(8):776. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080776.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of adjunctive drugs to levodopa for fluctuating Parkinson's disease - network meta-analysis.左旋多巴辅助药物治疗帕金森病症状波动的疗效和安全性比较——网状Meta分析
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023 Oct 19;9(1):143. doi: 10.1038/s41531-023-00589-8.
3
Neurodegenerative diseases and blood pressure variability: A comprehensive review from HOPE Asia.
神经退行性疾病与血压变异性:HOPE Asia 的全面综述。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Sep;24(9):1204-1217. doi: 10.1111/jch.14559.
4
Guidelines for Parkinson's disease treatment: consensus from the Movement Disorders Scientific Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology - motor symptoms.帕金森病治疗指南:巴西神经病学学会运动障碍科学部的共识——运动症状。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 Mar;80(3):316-329. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2021-0219.
5
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Dopamine Agonists in Advanced Parkinson's Disease With Motor Fluctuations: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.多巴胺激动剂在伴有运动波动的晚期帕金森病中的疗效与安全性比较:双盲随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 29;15:728083. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.728083. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparative effectiveness of dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitors for Parkinson's disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis.多巴胺激动剂和单胺氧化酶 B 抑制剂治疗帕金森病的疗效比较:一项多治疗比较荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;76(12):1731-1743. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02961-6. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
7
Effect of Concomitant Medications on the Safety and Efficacy of Extended-Release Carbidopa-Levodopa (IPX066) in Patients With Advanced Parkinson Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis.合并用药对晚期帕金森病患者缓释卡比多巴-左旋多巴(IPX066)安全性和有效性的影响:一项事后分析
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2018 Mar/Apr;41(2):47-55. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000269.
8
Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.十种治疗帕金森病药物的疗效和耐受性比较:网状荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 4;8:45865. doi: 10.1038/srep45865.
9
The Missing Medians: Exclusion of Ordinal Data from Meta-Analyses.缺失的中位数:在荟萃分析中排除有序数据
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145580. eCollection 2015.
10
Time to change the blind men and the elephant approach to Parkinson disease?是时候改变帕金森病的盲人摸象式研究方法了吗?
Neurology. 2015 Jul 14;85(2):190-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001739. Epub 2015 Jun 12.