Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Pentti J
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Turku, Finland.
Lancet. 1997 Oct 18;350(9085):1124-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03216-9.
Reduction of personnel by businesses and other organisations (organisational downsizing) is common in Europe, but little is known about its effects on the health of employees.
We used employers' records to investigate the relation between downsizing and subsequent absenteeism because of ill health in 981 local-government workers who remained in employment in Raisio, south-western Finland, during a period of economic decline (1991-95). Data were separated into three time periods: 1991, before downsizing; 1993, major downsizing in some workplaces and occupations; and 1993-95, after downsizing. We obtained data on sick leave from records kept by the occupational health-care unit in Raisio. We also investigated whether the effects of downsizing were dependent on ten other predictors of sick leave.
There was a significant association between downsizing and medically certified sick leave. The rate of absenteeism was 2.3 times greater (95% CI 2.0-2.7) after major downsizing, classified by occupation, than after minor downsizing. The corresponding rate ratios for musculoskeletal disorders and trauma were 5.7 (4.1-8.0) and 2.7 (1.7-4.2), respectively. The effects of downsizing by workplace depended on the age distribution of the staff. When the proportion of employees who were older than 50 years was high, downsizing increased the individual risk of absence because of ill health by 3.2-14.0 times, depending on diagnostic category. When the proportion of employees over 50 years was low, downsizing had only slight effects on health. Other risk factors that increased rates of sick leave after downsizing were age over 44 years, a large workplace, poor health before downsizing, and high income.
Downsizing is a risk to the health of employees. But this risk varies according to individual factors, such as age, socioeconomic status, and health, as well as factors related to place of work, for example, size and age structure of the staff.
企业和其他组织进行人员精简(组织规模缩减)在欧洲很常见,但对于其对员工健康的影响却知之甚少。
我们利用雇主记录,调查了981名芬兰西南部拉伊西奥市在经济衰退期(1991 - 1995年)仍在职的地方政府工作人员中,组织规模缩减与随后因健康问题缺勤之间的关系。数据被分为三个时间段:1991年,规模缩减前;1993年,一些工作场所和职业进行大规模规模缩减;1993 - 1995年,规模缩减后。我们从拉伊西奥市职业保健单位保存的记录中获取了病假数据。我们还调查了规模缩减的影响是否取决于其他十个病假预测因素。
规模缩减与经医学证明的病假之间存在显著关联。按职业分类,大规模规模缩减后的缺勤率比小规模规模缩减后高2.3倍(95%可信区间2.0 - 2.7)。肌肉骨骼疾病和创伤的相应比率分别为5.7(4.1 - 8.0)和2.7(1.7 - 4.2)。按工作场所进行规模缩减的影响取决于员工的年龄分布。当50岁以上员工比例较高时,规模缩减会使因健康问题缺勤的个人风险增加3.2至14.0倍,具体取决于诊断类别。当50岁以上员工比例较低时,规模缩减对健康的影响较小。其他在规模缩减后增加病假率的风险因素包括44岁以上的年龄、大型工作场所、规模缩减前健康状况不佳以及高收入。
规模缩减对员工健康构成风险。但这种风险因个体因素(如年龄、社会经济地位和健康状况)以及与工作场所相关的因素(例如员工规模和年龄结构)而异。