Sanders G, Wright M
Department of Psychology, London Guildhall University, England.
Arch Sex Behav. 1997 Oct;26(5):463-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1024551704723.
With each of the tasks in the present studies we expected to find the reported sex difference between heterosexual women and heterosexual men and we predicted a sexual orientation effect with the performance of homosexual men being similar to that of heterosexual women and different from that of heterosexual men. Study 1 aimed to replicate earlier findings by recording the performance of a group of homosexual men on a visuospatial task, the Vincent Mechanical Diagrams Test (VMDT), a dot detection divided visual field measure of functional cerebral asymmetry, and on five subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS). For each task the profile of scores obtained for the homosexual men was similar to that of heterosexual women in that they scored lower than heterosexual men on the VMDT, they showed less asymmetry, and they recorded a higher Verbal than Performance IQ on the WAIS. In Study 2, a male-biased targeted throwing task favored heterosexual men while, in contrast, on the female-biased Purdue Pegboard single peg condition heterosexual men were outperformed by heterosexual women and homosexual men. On neither of these two tasks did the performances of homosexual men and heterosexual women differ. One task, manual speed, yielded neither sex nor sexual orientation differences. Another, the Purdue Pegboard assemblies condition, revealed a sex difference but no sexual orientation difference. Failure to obtain a sexual orientation difference in the presence of a sex difference suggests that the sexual orientation effect may be restricted to a subset of sexually dimorphic tasks.
在本研究的各项任务中,我们期望能发现所报道的异性恋女性和异性恋男性之间的性别差异,并且我们预测性取向会产生影响,即同性恋男性的表现与异性恋女性相似,与异性恋男性不同。研究1旨在通过记录一组同性恋男性在视觉空间任务、文森特机械图测试(VMDT)、一种用于检测功能性脑不对称的点探测视野分割测量以及韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)的五个子测试中的表现来复制早期的研究结果。对于每项任务,同性恋男性获得的分数分布与异性恋女性相似,具体表现为他们在VMDT上的得分低于异性恋男性,表现出的不对称性较小,并且在WAIS上言语智商高于操作智商。在研究2中,一项偏向男性的定向投掷任务对异性恋男性有利,而相比之下,在偏向女性的普渡插板单孔条件下,异性恋男性的表现不如异性恋女性和同性恋男性。在这两项任务中,同性恋男性和异性恋女性的表现均无差异。一项任务,即手部速度,未产生性别或性取向差异。另一项任务,普渡插板组装条件,显示出性别差异,但没有性取向差异。在存在性别差异的情况下未能获得性取向差异,这表明性取向效应可能仅限于有性别差异的任务子集。