Curzen N P, Fox K M
Royal Brompton Hospital, London, U.K.
Eur Heart J. 1997 Oct;18(10):1530-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015132.
The ACE/angiotensin II/bradykinin system is inextricably linked to some of the processes that contribute to the generation of atherosclerosis at genetic, molecular, biochemical and pharmacological levels. There is a large body of laboratory-derived experimental data that suggests that inhibition of ACE activity has antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory effects that can modulate this atherosclerotic process from the earliest form of endothelial dysfunction, to delay of lesion formation in primary atherosclerosis or in myointimal proliferation after PTCA. The clinical evidence for these potential benefits is so far sparse. There are several possible explanations for these discrepancies. Firstly, the role of the ACE/bradykinin/angiotensin II system in the local vascular response to either the primary process of atherosclerosis, or to the injury induced by balloon angioplasty is likely to vary between species and models. Secondly, there is a tendency to ensure the presence of ACE inhibitor in high concentration before or during the vascular insult in animal models, whereas this has not been the case in the clinical studies of post-PTCA restenosis. Whilst the animal studies therefore offer potentially valuable insights into the mechanics of local vascular response, the ability of ACE inhibitors to interfere with such mechanisms now needs to be tested in clinical trials that are each aimed at precisely answering specific questions. The experimental data so far lend considerable support to the fact that drugs acting solely by interference with the angiotensin II-receptor complex are at a theoretical disadvantage, when compared with ACE inhibitors, since the former would be expected to have little effect on bradykinin-mediated activities. To the established benefits of ACE inhibitors in left ventricular dysfunction, and the interesting possibility that there may be an anti-ischaemic action in these circumstances, we may add the promise of the TREND study. In the coming years, there is an urgent requirement for intensive investigation into the ability of ACE inhibitors to modulate the various stages of the atherosclerotic spectrum. For now though, the jury remains out.
ACE/血管紧张素II/缓激肽系统在遗传、分子、生化和药理学水平上与某些导致动脉粥样硬化形成的过程有着千丝万缕的联系。大量源自实验室的实验数据表明,抑制ACE活性具有抗增殖、抗炎和血管舒张作用,可从最早的内皮功能障碍形式开始调节这一动脉粥样硬化过程,直至延缓原发性动脉粥样硬化或PTCA后肌内膜增殖中病变的形成。目前,这些潜在益处的临床证据还很稀少。对于这些差异有几种可能的解释。首先,ACE/缓激肽/血管紧张素II系统在局部血管对动脉粥样硬化原发性过程或球囊血管成形术所致损伤的反应中的作用,在不同物种和模型之间可能有所不同。其次,在动物模型中,倾向于在血管损伤之前或期间确保高浓度ACE抑制剂的存在,而在PTCA后再狭窄的临床研究中并非如此。因此,虽然动物研究为局部血管反应机制提供了潜在的有价值的见解,但ACE抑制剂干扰此类机制的能力现在需要在旨在精确回答特定问题的临床试验中进行测试。迄今为止的实验数据有力地支持了这样一个事实,即与ACE抑制剂相比,仅通过干扰血管紧张素II受体复合物起作用的药物在理论上处于劣势,因为预计前者对缓激肽介导的活性影响很小。除了ACE抑制剂在左心室功能障碍方面已确立的益处,以及在这些情况下可能存在抗缺血作用这一有趣的可能性之外,我们还可以加上TREND研究的前景。在未来几年,迫切需要深入研究ACE抑制剂调节动脉粥样硬化谱各个阶段的能力。不过目前,尚无定论。