Young G, Bowers R, Hall B, Port M
Visioncare Research Ltd, Farnham, U.K.
CLAO J. 1997 Oct;23(4):226-36.
We performed a six-month, comparative, contralateral/bilateral study to assess the clinical performance of the Proclear contact lens, which is manufactured from a novel, biomimetic, 59% water content, hydrogel material (Omafilcon A). Omafilcon A is a hydrogel polymer and is based on a new biomimetic approach to the design of biomaterials for biomedical applications. The polymer incorporates a synthetic analogue of the phosphorylcholine (PC) headgroup, an important component found in all human cells.
Forty-two subjects were fit with the Proclear lens for 6 months of daily wear; 20 subjects wore a Proclear lens in one eye and a Permaflex lens in the fellow as a control, while 22 subjects wore Proclear lenses in both eyes. A one-step hydrogen peroxide system was used for disinfection and no protein remover was used.
No subject was required to withdraw due to unacceptable physiological findings with the Proclear lens. At the 3-month visit, corneal staining was present in 33% of the Proclear eyes compared to 72% of the Permaflex-wearing eyes. At one month, the Proclear lens was graded significantly more comfortable than the Permaflex lens (P < 0.01), and all 11 of the subjects who expressed a preference did so in favor of the Proclear lens. Overall, the fitting characteristics and visual performance of the Proclear lens did not appear to vary during the study. Spectrofluorimetric analysis of worn lenses confirm that Proclear showed minimal protein and lipid spoliation, which was found to be independent of wear time and subject variations. In contrast, despite the use of a surfactant cleaner, Permaflex lenses showed measurable and significant levels of lipid spoilation. Despite significant differences in average mean thicknesses and the level of bulk water in the lenses, in vivo dehydration of the Proclear lens was significantly lower than that of the Permaflex lens.
The results of this study have confirmed the viability of biomimetic PC-hydrogels in contact lens applications. In vivo and in vitro analyses tended to confirm that Omafilcon A has a number of superior material attributes, as compared to conventional hydrogels when used in contact lens applications.
我们进行了一项为期六个月的对比性对侧/双侧研究,以评估由新型仿生、含水量为59%的水凝胶材料(欧玛菲康A)制成的保视宁隐形眼镜的临床性能。欧玛菲康A是一种水凝胶聚合物,基于一种用于生物医学应用的生物材料设计的新型仿生方法。该聚合物包含磷酰胆碱(PC)头部基团的合成类似物,这是在所有人体细胞中发现的一种重要成分。
42名受试者每天佩戴保视宁镜片6个月;20名受试者一只眼睛佩戴保视宁镜片,另一只眼睛佩戴Permaflex镜片作为对照,而22名受试者双眼均佩戴保视宁镜片。使用一步过氧化氢系统进行消毒,未使用蛋白质去除剂。
没有受试者因保视宁镜片出现不可接受的生理结果而被要求退出。在3个月的随访中,保视宁镜片组的眼睛有33%出现角膜染色,而佩戴Permaflex镜片组的眼睛有72%出现角膜染色。在1个月时,保视宁镜片的舒适度评分明显高于Permaflex镜片(P < 0.01),所有11名表达偏好的受试者都选择了保视宁镜片。总体而言,保视宁镜片的适配特性和视觉性能在研究期间似乎没有变化。对佩戴过的镜片进行荧光光谱分析证实,保视宁镜片的蛋白质和脂质污染极少,且发现其与佩戴时间和个体差异无关。相比之下,尽管使用了表面活性剂清洁剂,Permaflex镜片仍显示出可测量的显著脂质污染水平。尽管镜片的平均厚度和总体含水量存在显著差异,但保视宁镜片的体内脱水明显低于Permaflex镜片。
本研究结果证实了仿生PC水凝胶在隐形眼镜应用中的可行性。体内和体外分析倾向于证实,与传统水凝胶相比,欧玛菲康A在用于隐形眼镜应用时具有许多优越的材料特性。