Marples R R, Rosdahl V T
Laboratory of Hospital Infection, PHLS Central Public Health Laboratory, London.
J Med Microbiol. 1997 Jun;46(6):511-6. doi: 10.1099/00222615-46-6-511.
A questionnaire was sent to the 48 national typing centres for Staphylococcus aureus and 31 replies were received. Methods of phage typing varied and molecular methods were not universally available, although pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was offered by 13 centres. Results for a quality control phage typing exercise were received from 25 centres. Increased standardisation of methods and definitions are indicated. Differences from the consensus patterns were mainly due to typing at an inappropriate dilution of phage, but five strains caused difficulties in many centres. Overall reproducibility was good. Phage typing remains a cost-effective method for epidemiological studies, particularly on a large scale. The strains selected for the quality control exercise included many strains suitable for controlling molecular methods as well as testing phage typing. Molecular methods help in the validation of the conclusions which may be drawn from phage typing.
一份调查问卷被发送至48个国家金黄色葡萄球菌分型中心,共收到31份回复。噬菌体分型方法各异,分子方法并非普遍可用,不过有13个中心提供脉冲场凝胶电泳法。25个中心提交了质量控制噬菌体分型检测的结果。结果表明需要提高方法和定义的标准化程度。与共识模式的差异主要是由于在不适当的噬菌体稀释度下进行分型,但有5株菌株在许多中心造成了困难。总体再现性良好。噬菌体分型仍然是一种具有成本效益的流行病学研究方法,特别是在大规模研究中。为质量控制检测挑选的菌株包括许多适合用于验证分子方法以及测试噬菌体分型的菌株。分子方法有助于验证从噬菌体分型得出的结论。