短期与长期血液透析的比较
A comparison of short and long haemodialysis.
作者信息
Alvarez-ude F, Ward M, Elliott R W, Uldall P R, Wilkinson R, Appleton D R, Kerr D N, Petrella E, Gentile M, Romagnoni M, Orlandini G, Luciani L, Ferrandes C, D'Amico G
出版信息
Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc. 1976;12:606-13.
Two groups of patients treated by short (Milan) and long (Newcastle) haemodialysis were compared for incidence of symptoms and biochemical control. Short dialysis corrected urea and creatinine as well but control of potassium and phosphate were similar. The only apparent penalties to be paid by short dialysis patients were a higher incidence of itching, tingling or numbness, impairment of vibratory sense and difficulty in controlling blood pressure. The short dialysis group had higher haemoglobin and less dyspnoea, muscle weakness and dizziness after dialysis.
对两组分别接受短程（米兰）和长程（纽卡斯尔）血液透析治疗的患者的症状发生率和生化指标控制情况进行了比较。短程透析同样能纠正尿素和肌酐水平，但钾和磷酸盐的控制情况相似。短程透析患者唯一明显的代价是瘙痒、刺痛或麻木的发生率较高，振动觉受损以及血压控制困难。短程透析组患者的血红蛋白水平较高，透析后呼吸困难、肌肉无力和头晕的症状较少。
Zotero 插件