Trafford J A, Sharpstone P, Evans R, Ireland R
Br Med J. 1979 Feb 24;1(6162):518-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6162.518.
A study was carried out to compare the effects of three dialysis regimens of different durations. Nineteen patients dialysed over 1975--7 for an average of only 11.2 hours per week were compared with nine dialysed for 24 hours per week (1974--6) and 10 dialysed for 27 hours (1971--3). Clinical, biochemical, and haematological results showed that the short dialysis regimen was as effective as the longer regimens, except that patients had to take a phosphate binder regularly, and that it was considerably cheaper. Short dialysis has social and economic benefits, since patients have more free time and more patients can be treated with the same number of staff and dialysis stations. As in many areas there is a shortage of places for patients needing dialysis, a short regimen is recommended.
开展了一项研究以比较三种不同时长透析方案的效果。将1975年至1977年期间进行透析、平均每周仅透析11.2小时的19名患者,与1974年至1976年期间每周透析24小时的9名患者以及1971年至1973年期间每周透析27小时的10名患者进行了比较。临床、生化和血液学结果表明,短透析方案与长透析方案效果相同,只是患者必须定期服用磷酸盐结合剂,而且短透析方案成本要低得多。短透析具有社会和经济效益,因为患者有更多自由时间,并且在相同数量的工作人员和透析站的情况下可以治疗更多患者。由于在许多地区,需要透析的患者治疗场所短缺,因此推荐采用短透析方案。