Suppr超能文献

选择性和非选择性α1A-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂治疗良性前列腺增生的临床比较:坦索罗辛固定剂量及特拉唑嗪递增剂量的研究

Clinical comparison of selective and non-selective alpha 1A-adrenoreceptor antagonists in benign prostatic hyperplasia: studies on tamsulosin in a fixed dose and terazosin in increasing doses.

作者信息

Lee E, Lee C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea.

出版信息

Br J Urol. 1997 Oct;80(4):606-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00411.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of a fixed dose (0.2 mg) of tamsulosin, a selective alpha 1A-adrenoreceptor antagonist, with an increasing dose (1-5 mg) of terazosin, a non-selective antagonist, in the treatment of urinary outflow obstruction associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Korean patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised a single-blind and randomized design with tamsulosin or terazosin taken once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 98 patients was enrolled, with 72 patients included in the analyses after 4 and 8 weeks. The primary variables assessed were changes in the maximum urinary flow rate Qmax and the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), with the post-void residual urine volume, 'obstructive' and 'irritative' questions in the IPSS, and the investigators' global assessment of efficacy also determined. The number of patients with a clinically significant response to treatment with tamsulosin or terazosin was determined and defined as those with > 20% improvement from the baseline Qmax or > 20% decrease in total IPSS. Adverse reactions possibly or probably related to study medication were recorded throughout the treatment period.

RESULTS

Both tamsulosin and terazosin produced similar significant improvements in subjective and objective symptoms of urinary outflow obstruction (P > 0.05). Systolic and diastolic (standing) blood pressures decreased significantly in patients treated with terazosin (P < 0.05). The adverse reactions, most frequently dry mouth and dizziness which were usually mild and transient, were significantly higher in patients on terazosin (18 patients, versus one on tamsulosin, P < 0.001). The changes led to discontinuation of therapy in two patients on terazosin.

CONCLUSION

Tamsulosin was as effective as terazosin in treating urinary outflow obstruction associated with BPH, but had a markedly better safety profile.

摘要

目的

比较固定剂量(0.2毫克)的坦索罗辛(一种选择性α1A肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂)与递增剂量(1 - 5毫克)的特拉唑嗪(一种非选择性拮抗剂)在治疗韩国良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者伴发的尿路梗阻方面的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

该研究采用单盲随机设计,坦索罗辛或特拉唑嗪每日服用一次,持续8周。共纳入98例患者,4周和8周后有72例患者纳入分析。评估的主要变量为最大尿流率Qmax和国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)总分的变化,同时还测定了排尿后残余尿量、IPSS中的“梗阻性”和“刺激性”问题以及研究者对疗效的整体评估。确定并定义对坦索罗辛或特拉唑嗪治疗有临床显著反应的患者数量为Qmax较基线改善>20%或IPSS总分降低>20%的患者。在整个治疗期间记录可能或很可能与研究药物相关的不良反应。

结果

坦索罗辛和特拉唑嗪在尿路梗阻的主观和客观症状方面均产生了相似的显著改善(P>0.05)。接受特拉唑嗪治疗的患者收缩压和舒张压(站立位)显著降低(P<0.05)。不良反应方面,最常见的口干和头晕通常较轻且为短暂性,接受特拉唑嗪治疗的患者中不良反应发生率显著更高(18例,而接受坦索罗辛治疗的为1例,P<0.001)。这些变化导致2例接受特拉唑嗪治疗的患者停药。

结论

坦索罗辛在治疗BPH伴发的尿路梗阻方面与特拉唑嗪疗效相当,但安全性明显更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验