Suppr超能文献

Comparison study on three protocols used to concentrate poliovirus type 1 from drinking water.

作者信息

Senouci S, Maul A, Schwartzbrod L

机构信息

Laboratoire de Virologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, Nancy, France.

出版信息

Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996 Mar;198(4):307-17.

PMID:9353536
Abstract

The efficiency of three techniques used to concentrate enteric viruses from water media and based on adsorption-elution on glass are tested. The techniques are adsorption on glass wool (GW) at the natural pH of the water and adsorption on glass powder using acidified water (pH 3.5). In the second case, two devices are used the classical apparatus (CGP) and the modified apparatus (MGP). A solution of glycine 0.05 M--3% beef extract pH 9.5 is used in all three techniques to perform the elution. The sensitivity of the above concentration methods is assayed with samples of 20 liters of tap water artificially contaminated with a known quantity of poliovirus type 1 (10(1) to 10(7) MPNCU [20 L]-1). The resulting concentrates are inoculated to BGM cell cultures and tittered according to the MPN technique. The study demonstrated that the recovery rate increased with the viral concentration of the samples with maximum efficiency reaching 81% for GW, 89% for CGP and 99% for MGP. A Wilcoxon test performed on paired samples and on the overall results with all three methods. Significant differences were demonstrated leading to the ranking of the techniques in the growing order of sensitivity GW, CGP and MGP. These finding were confirmed using a fitting technique according to the algorithm of Marquardt.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验