Clayton H M
Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Equine Vet J Suppl. 1997 May(23):54-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb05054.x.
The objective was to determine whether collected trot, passage and piaffe could be distinguished as separate gaits on the basis of temporal variables. Sagittal plane, 60 Hz videotapes of 10 finalists in the dressage competitions at the 1992 Olympic Games were analysed to measure the temporal variables in absolute terms and as percentages of stride duration. Classification was based on analysis of variance, a graphical method and discriminant analysis. Stride duration was sufficient to distinguish collected trot from passage and piaffe in all horses. The analysis of variance showed that the mean values of most variables differed significantly between passage and piaffe. When hindlimb stance percentage was plotted against diagonal advanced placement percentage, some overlap was found between all 3 movements indicating that individual horses could not be classified reliably in this manner. Using hindlimb stance percentage and diagonal advanced placement percentage as input in a discriminant analysis, 80% of the cases were classified correctly, but at least one horse was misclassified in each movement. When the absolute, rather than percentage, values of the 2 variables were used as input in the discriminant analysis, 90% of the cases were correctly classified and the only misclassifications were between passage and piaffe. However, the 2 horses in which piaffe was misclassified as passage were the gold and silver medallists. In general, higher placed horses tended toward longer diagonal advanced placements, especially in collected trot and passage, and shorter hindlimb stance percentages in passage and piaffe.
目的是确定能否根据时间变量将所采集的快步、跑步及原地踏步识别为不同的步态。对1992年奥运会盛装舞步比赛10名决赛选手矢状面60赫兹的录像带进行分析,以绝对数值及步幅时长百分比的形式测量时间变量。分类基于方差分析、一种图形方法及判别分析。步幅时长足以区分所有马匹的快步与跑步及原地踏步。方差分析表明,跑步和原地踏步之间多数变量的均值存在显著差异。当以后肢站立百分比对斜对角前伸位置百分比作图时,发现所有三种动作之间存在一些重叠,这表明无法以这种方式可靠地对个体马匹进行分类。将后肢站立百分比和斜对角前伸位置百分比作为判别分析的输入变量时,80%的情况分类正确,但每种动作中至少有一匹马分类错误。当将这两个变量的绝对值而非百分比值用作判别分析的输入变量时,90%的情况分类正确,唯一的分类错误发生在跑步和原地踏步之间。然而,被误将原地踏步分类为跑步的两匹马是金牌和银牌得主。总体而言,排名靠前的马匹往往斜对角前伸位置更长,尤其是在快步和跑步时,而在跑步和原地踏步时后肢站立百分比更短。